| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Uporaba prisilnih sredstev nad zaprtimi osebami : diplomsko delo visokošolskega študijskega programa Varnost in policijsko delo
Authors:ID Kastelic, Kristina (Author)
ID Hacin, Rok (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf VS_Kastelic_Kristina_2024.pdf (1,66 MB)
MD5: CFDD73DA4EAA592D251E323106BF7C10
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Pazniki so pomemben del osebja v zaporih, saj zagotavljajo varno okolje tako za zaprte osebe kot tudi zaporske delavce. Pazniki imajo pooblastila za zagotavljanje reda in varnosti v zaporih, vključno z uporabo prisilnih sredstev, s katerimi posegajo v integriteto posameznika, proti kateremu so ta uporabljena. Pri tem upoštevajo načelo postopnosti in sorazmernosti, saj prisilna sredstva uporabljajo le v nujnih situacijah, ko na drugačen način ne morejo zagotoviti reda in varnosti, in ob spoštovanju temeljnih človekovih pravic in svoboščin. V zaključnem delu smo se osredotočili na uporabo prisilnih sredstev nad zaprtimi osebami. Na podlagi pregleda znanstvene in strokovne literature in analize statističnih podatkov o uporabi prisilnih sredstev v zaporih smo ugotovili, da je od leta 2000 do leta 2021 uporaba prisilnih sredstev paznikov v slovenskih zavodih za prestajanje kazni zapora nad zaprtimi osebami porasla. Predvsem je opazen porast uporabe telesne sile, nekoliko pa tudi sredstev za vklepanje. Ugotovili smo, da je med letoma 2000 in 2021 porasla tudi upravičenost uporabe prisilnih sredstev, medtem ko je neupravičena in nepotrebna uporaba teh upadla. Pri analiziranju statističnih podatkov letnih poročil Varuha človekovih pravic smo ugotovili, da se je število podanih pobud zaprtih oseb v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšalo. To potrjuje, da pazniki uspešno rešujejo konfliktne situacije z metodami, ki ne zahtevajo uporabe prisilnih sredstev, ali pa je uporaba teh ustrezna.
Keywords:zaporniki, prisilna sredstva, pazniki, diplomske naloge
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:K. Kastelic
Year of publishing:2024
Year of performance:2024
Number of pages:V f., [44] str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-88673 New window
UDC:351.741(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:197515011 New window
Publication date in DKUM:03.06.2024
Views:375
Downloads:127
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:17.05.2024

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Use of coercive measures upon imprisoned persons
Abstract:Prison officers present an important part of prison staff, as they provide a safe environment for both prisoners and prison workers. Prison officers have powers to ensure order and security in prisons, including the use of coercive measures to interfere with the integrity of the individual against whom they are used. In doing so, they take into account the principle of gradualism and proportionality, since they use coercive means only in situations when they cannot ensure order and security in any other way, and with respect for fundamental human rights and freedoms. In the thesis, we focused on the use of coercive measures against imprisoned persons. Based on a review of scientific and professional literature and an analysis of statistical data on the use of coercive measures in prisons, we found that from 2000 to 2021, the use of coercive measures by prison officers in Slovenian prisons increased. Above all, there is a noticeable increase in the use of physical force, and to a lesser extent the use of restraints. We found that between 2000 and 2021, the justification for the use of coercive measures also increased, while the unjustified and unnecessary use of them decreased. When analyzing the statistical data of the Ombudsman's annual reports, we found that the number of initiatives given by imprisoned persons decreased during the period under review. This confirms that prison officers successfully resolve conflict situations with methods that do not require the use of coercive means, or that the use of them is appropriate.
Keywords:imprisoned persons, coercive measures, prison officers, Slovenia


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica