| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Proceedings in the case of Benedik v. Slovenia : Bachelor thesis undergraduate study programme Criminal Juctice and Security, B.A.
Authors:ID Jovanovska, Ana (Author)
ID Flander, Benjamin (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Jovanovska_Ana_2024.pdf (918,30 KB)
MD5: 6C9C4CB86FC926E8EE797CB5E8D27C44
 
Language:English
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:The case of Benedik v. Slovenia is a perfect example of the complexity between the right to privacy and covert investigative measures carried out by law enforcement in the digital age. Thus, this thesis aims to precisely explain the legislation governing the right to privacy under both internal law and the European Convention on Human Rights, with a particular emphasis on covert investigative measures. By exploring and defining the legal frameworks that protect the privacy rights of individuals, we aim to clarify the balance between state surveillance powers and individuals' privacy rights. The study systematically shows the evolution and current state of the legal provisions regarding covert investigative measures in Slovenia. The main focus of this thesis is the legal proceedings in the case of Benedik v. Slovenia. It serves as a prism through which the complexities of privacy protection, specifically, electronic privacy are analyzed in the context of data disclosure and internet usage. The study examines the legal proceedings at all court instances, including Kranj District Court, Ljubljana Higher Court, Supreme Court, and Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia leading to a complaint that the applicant, Benedik, filed at the Strasbourg Court. The later ruling of the European Court of Human Rights addressed the interaction between domestic laws and international human rights norms in detail. An in-depth understanding of how covert investigative measures are integrated with the right to privacy is provided through an analysis of the arguments made, the legal reasoning used by the courts, and the verdicts issued. This thesis's comprehensive explanation offers valuable insights into the balance between state surveillance needs and the protection of individuals' right to privacy, highlighting the complexities of these issues in the modern digital age.
Keywords:Benedik v. Slovenia, analysis of the judicial proceedings, human rights, right to privacy, covert investigative measures
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:A. Jovanovska
Year of publishing:2024
Year of performance:2024
Number of pages:V f., [48] str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-89854 New window
UDC:343.132(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:205582851 New window
Publication date in DKUM:28.08.2024
Views:399
Downloads:151
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:14.08.2024

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Analiza sodnih postopkov v zadevi Benedik proti Sloveniji
Abstract:Primer Benedik proti Sloveniji je odličen primer kompleksnosti med pravico do zasebnosti in prikritimi preiskovalnimi ukrepi, ki jih izvajajo organi pregona v digitalni dobi. Tako si to diplomsko delo prizadeva natančno pojasniti zakonodajo, ki ureja pravico do zasebnosti po notranjem pravu in Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah, s posebnim poudarkom na prikritih preiskovalnih ukrepih. S proučevanjem in opredelitvijo pravnih okvirov, ki varujejo pravice posameznikov do zasebnosti, želimo pojasniti ravnovesje med pooblastili državnega nadzora in pravicami posameznikov do zasebnosti. Študija sistematično prikazuje razvoj in trenutni položaj pravnih določb glede prikritih preiskovalnih ukrepov v Sloveniji. Glavni poudarek te diplomske naloge so sodni postopki v primeru Benedik proti Sloveniji. Služi kot prizma, skozi katero se analizirajo zapletenosti varstva zasebnosti, zlasti elektornske zasebnosti, v kontekstu razkritja podatkov i uporabe interneta. Preučuje sodne postopke na vseh sodnih istancah, vključno z Okrožnim sodiščem v Kranju, Višjim sodiščem v Ljubljani, Vrhovnim sodiščem in Ustavnim sodiščem Republike Slovenije, ki so privedli do pritožbe, ki jo je vložil protožnik Benedik na sodiše v Strasbourgu. Kasnejša odločitev Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice je podrobno obravnavala interakcijo med domačo zakonodajo in mednarodnimi normami človekovih pravic. Diplomska naloga ponuja poglobljeno razumevanje, kako so prikriti preiksovalni ukrepi povezani s pravico do zasebnosti, skozi analizo podanih argumentov, pravnega razmišljanja sodišč in izrečenih sodb. Na ta način prispeva k celovitem vpogledu v ravnovesje med potrebami državnega nadzora in zaščito posameznikove zasebnosti, ter osvetli kompleksnost teh vprašanj v sodobni digitalni dobi.
Keywords:analiza sodnih postopkov, človekove pravice, pravica do zasebnosti, prikriti preiskovalni ukrepi, diplomske naloge


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica