| Naslov: | The analysis of nonverbal communication : the dangers of pseudoscience in security and justice contexts |
|---|
| Avtorji: | ID Denault, Vincent (Avtor)
ID Areh, Igor (Avtor)
ID Plusquellec, Pierrich (Avtor)
ID Jupe, Louise M. (Avtor)
ID St-Yves, Michel (Avtor)
ID Dunbar, Norah E. (Avtor)
ID Hartwig, Maria (Avtor)
ID Sporer, Siegfried L. (Avtor)
ID Rioux-Turcotte, Jessica (Avtor)
ID Jarry, Jonathan (Avtor)
ID Walsh, Dave (Avtor)
ID Otgaar, Henry (Avtor)
ID Viziteu, Andrei (Avtor)
ID Viziteu, Andrei (Avtor)
ID Talwar, Victoria (Avtor)
ID Keatley, David A. (Avtor)
ID Blandón-Gitlin, Iris (Avtor)
ID Townson, Clint (Avtor)
ID Deslauriers-Varin, Nadine (Avtor)
ID Lilienfeld, Scott O. (Avtor)
ID Patterson, Miles L. (Avtor)
ID Allan, Alfred (Avtor)
ID Evans Cameron, Hilary (Avtor)
ID Boivin, Rémi (Avtor)
ID ten Brinke, Leanne (Avtor)
ID Masip, Jaume (Avtor)
ID Bull, Ray (Avtor)
ID Cyr, Mireille (Avtor)
ID Hope, Lorraine (Avtor)
ID Strömwall, Leif A. (Avtor)
ID Bennett, Stephanie J. (Avtor)
ID Al Menaiya, Faisal (Avtor)
ID Leo, Richard A. (Avtor)
ID Vredeveldt, Annelies (Avtor)
ID Laforest, Marty (Avtor)
ID Honts, Charles R. (Avtor)
ID Manzanero, Antonio L. (Avtor)
ID Mann, Samantha (Avtor)
ID Anders Granhag, Pär (Avtor)
ID Ask, Karl (Avtor)
ID Gabbert, Fiona (Avtor)
ID Guay, Jean-Pierre (Avtor)
ID Coutant, Alexandre (Avtor)
ID Hancock, Jeffrey (Avtor)
ID Manusov, Valerie Lynn (Avtor)
ID Burgoon, Judee K. (Avtor)
ID Kleinman, Steven M. (Avtor)
ID Wright, Gordon (Avtor)
ID Landström, Sara (Avtor)
ID Freckelton, Ian (Avtor)
ID Vernham, Zarah (Avtor)
ID van Koppen, Peter J. (Avtor) |
|---|
| Datoteke: |  Denault-2020-The_Analysis_of_Nonverbal_Communi.pdf (329,89 KB)
MD5: 5C2BDDC9BAC35180CB932206696A7896
 https://doi.org/10.5093/apj2019a9
|
|---|
| Jezik: | Angleški jezik |
|---|
| Vrsta gradiva: | Znanstveno delo |
|---|
| Tipologija: | 1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek |
|---|
| Organizacija: | FVV - Fakulteta za varnostne vede
|
|---|
| Opis: | For security and justice professionals (e.g., police officers, lawyers, judges), the thousands of peer-reviewed articles on nonverbal communication represent important sources of knowledge. However, despite the scope of the scientific work carried out on this subject, professionals can turn to programs, methods, and approaches that fail to reflect the state of science. The objective of this article is to examine (i) concepts of nonverbal communication conveyed by these programs, methods, and approaches, but also (ii) the consequences of their use (e.g., on the life or liberty of individuals). To achieve this objective, we describe the scope of scientific research on nonverbal communication. A program (SPOT; Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques), a method (the BAI; Behavior Analysis Interview) and an approach (synergology) that each run counter to the state of science are examined. Finally, we outline five hypotheses to explain why some organizations in the fields of security and justice are turning to pseudoscience and pseudoscientific techniques. We conclude the article by inviting these organizations to work with the international community of scholars who have scientific expertise in nonverbal communication and lie (and truth) detection to implement evidence-based For security and justice professionals (e.g., police officers, lawyers, judges), the thousands of peer-reviewed articles on nonverbal communication represent important sources of knowledge. However, despite the scope of the scientific work carried out on this subject, professionals can turn to programs, methods, and approaches that fail to reflect the state of science. The objective of this article is to examine (i) concepts of nonverbal communication conveyed by these programs, methods, and approaches, but also (ii) the consequences of their use (e.g., on the life or liberty of individuals). To achieve this objective, we describe the scope of scientific research on nonverbal communication. A program (SPOT; Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques), a method (the BAI; Behavior Analysis Interview) and an approach (synergology) that each run counter to the state of science are examined. Finally, we outline five hypotheses to explain why some organizations in the fields of security and justice are turning to pseudoscience and pseudoscientific techniques. We conclude the article by inviting these organizations to work with the international community of scholars who have scientific expertise in nonverbal communication and lie (and truth) detection to implement evidence-based practices.practices. |
|---|
| Ključne besede: | pseudoscience, nonverbal communication, SPOT, behavior analysis interview, synergology |
|---|
| Status publikacije: | Objavljeno |
|---|
| Verzija publikacije: | Objavljena publikacija |
|---|
| Poslano v recenzijo: | 18.03.2019 |
|---|
| Datum sprejetja članka: | 03.04.2019 |
|---|
| Datum objave: | 30.04.2019 |
|---|
| Založnik: | Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos, Delegación de Madrid |
|---|
| Leto izida: | 2020 |
|---|
| Št. strani: | Str. 1-12 |
|---|
| Številčenje: | Letn. 30, št. 1 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DKUM-91608  |
|---|
| UDK: | 159.9:340.6 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 3697898 |
|---|
| DOI: | 10.5093/apj2019a9 |
|---|
| ISSN pri članku: | 1133-0740 |
|---|
| Opomba: | Ključne besede v slovenščini: psevdoznanost, nebesedna komunikacija, SPOT, analiza vedenja, neverbalna komunikacija |
|---|
| Datum objave v DKUM: | 20.01.2025 |
|---|
| Število ogledov: | 176 |
|---|
| Število prenosov: | 19 |
|---|
| Metapodatki: |    |
|---|
| Področja: | Ostalo
|
|---|
|
:
|
Kopiraj citat |
|---|
| | | | Skupna ocena: | (0 glasov) |
|---|
| Vaša ocena: | Ocenjevanje je dovoljeno samo prijavljenim uporabnikom. |
|---|
| Objavi na: |  |
|---|
Postavite miškin kazalec na naslov za izpis povzetka. Klik na naslov izpiše
podrobnosti ali sproži prenos. |
