| Title: | The analysis of nonverbal communication : the dangers of pseudoscience in security and justice contexts |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Denault, Vincent (Author)
ID Areh, Igor (Author)
ID Plusquellec, Pierrich (Author)
ID Jupe, Louise M. (Author)
ID St-Yves, Michel (Author)
ID Dunbar, Norah E. (Author)
ID Hartwig, Maria (Author)
ID Sporer, Siegfried L. (Author)
ID Rioux-Turcotte, Jessica (Author)
ID Jarry, Jonathan (Author)
ID Walsh, Dave (Author)
ID Otgaar, Henry (Author)
ID Viziteu, Andrei (Author)
ID Viziteu, Andrei (Author)
ID Talwar, Victoria (Author)
ID Keatley, David A. (Author)
ID Blandón-Gitlin, Iris (Author)
ID Townson, Clint (Author)
ID Deslauriers-Varin, Nadine (Author)
ID Lilienfeld, Scott O. (Author)
ID Patterson, Miles L. (Author)
ID Allan, Alfred (Author)
ID Evans Cameron, Hilary (Author)
ID Boivin, Rémi (Author)
ID ten Brinke, Leanne (Author)
ID Masip, Jaume (Author)
ID Bull, Ray (Author)
ID Cyr, Mireille (Author)
ID Hope, Lorraine (Author)
ID Strömwall, Leif A. (Author)
ID Bennett, Stephanie J. (Author)
ID Al Menaiya, Faisal (Author)
ID Leo, Richard A. (Author)
ID Vredeveldt, Annelies (Author)
ID Laforest, Marty (Author)
ID Honts, Charles R. (Author)
ID Manzanero, Antonio L. (Author)
ID Mann, Samantha (Author)
ID Anders Granhag, Pär (Author)
ID Ask, Karl (Author)
ID Gabbert, Fiona (Author)
ID Guay, Jean-Pierre (Author)
ID Coutant, Alexandre (Author)
ID Hancock, Jeffrey (Author)
ID Manusov, Valerie Lynn (Author)
ID Burgoon, Judee K. (Author)
ID Kleinman, Steven M. (Author)
ID Wright, Gordon (Author)
ID Landström, Sara (Author)
ID Freckelton, Ian (Author)
ID Vernham, Zarah (Author)
ID van Koppen, Peter J. (Author) |
|---|
| Files: |  Denault-2020-The_Analysis_of_Nonverbal_Communi.pdf (329,89 KB)
MD5: 5C2BDDC9BAC35180CB932206696A7896
 https://doi.org/10.5093/apj2019a9
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Work type: | Scientific work |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
|---|
| Organization: | FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
|
|---|
| Abstract: | For security and justice professionals (e.g., police officers, lawyers, judges), the thousands of peer-reviewed articles on nonverbal communication represent important sources of knowledge. However, despite the scope of the scientific work carried out on this subject, professionals can turn to programs, methods, and approaches that fail to reflect the state of science. The objective of this article is to examine (i) concepts of nonverbal communication conveyed by these programs, methods, and approaches, but also (ii) the consequences of their use (e.g., on the life or liberty of individuals). To achieve this objective, we describe the scope of scientific research on nonverbal communication. A program (SPOT; Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques), a method (the BAI; Behavior Analysis Interview) and an approach (synergology) that each run counter to the state of science are examined. Finally, we outline five hypotheses to explain why some organizations in the fields of security and justice are turning to pseudoscience and pseudoscientific techniques. We conclude the article by inviting these organizations to work with the international community of scholars who have scientific expertise in nonverbal communication and lie (and truth) detection to implement evidence-based For security and justice professionals (e.g., police officers, lawyers, judges), the thousands of peer-reviewed articles on nonverbal communication represent important sources of knowledge. However, despite the scope of the scientific work carried out on this subject, professionals can turn to programs, methods, and approaches that fail to reflect the state of science. The objective of this article is to examine (i) concepts of nonverbal communication conveyed by these programs, methods, and approaches, but also (ii) the consequences of their use (e.g., on the life or liberty of individuals). To achieve this objective, we describe the scope of scientific research on nonverbal communication. A program (SPOT; Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques), a method (the BAI; Behavior Analysis Interview) and an approach (synergology) that each run counter to the state of science are examined. Finally, we outline five hypotheses to explain why some organizations in the fields of security and justice are turning to pseudoscience and pseudoscientific techniques. We conclude the article by inviting these organizations to work with the international community of scholars who have scientific expertise in nonverbal communication and lie (and truth) detection to implement evidence-based practices.practices. |
|---|
| Keywords: | pseudoscience, nonverbal communication, SPOT, behavior analysis interview, synergology |
|---|
| Publication status: | Published |
|---|
| Publication version: | Version of Record |
|---|
| Submitted for review: | 18.03.2019 |
|---|
| Article acceptance date: | 03.04.2019 |
|---|
| Publication date: | 30.04.2019 |
|---|
| Publisher: | Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos, Delegación de Madrid |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2020 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | Str. 1-12 |
|---|
| Numbering: | Letn. 30, št. 1 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DKUM-91608  |
|---|
| UDC: | 159.9:340.6 |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 1133-0740 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 3697898 |
|---|
| DOI: | 10.5093/apj2019a9 |
|---|
| Note: | Ključne besede v slovenščini: psevdoznanost, nebesedna komunikacija, SPOT, analiza vedenja, neverbalna komunikacija |
|---|
| Publication date in DKUM: | 20.01.2025 |
|---|
| Views: | 171 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 19 |
|---|
| Metadata: |    |
|---|
| Categories: | Misc.
|
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Average score: | (0 votes) |
|---|
| Your score: | Voting is allowed only for logged in users. |
|---|
| Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
