| Title: | Two-by-two ordinal patterns in art paintings |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Tarozo, Mateus M. (Author)
ID Pessa, Arthur A. B. (Author)
ID Zunino, Luciano (Author)
ID Rosso, Osvaldo A. (Author)
ID Perc, Matjaž (Author)
ID Ribeiro, Haroldo V. (Author) |
|---|
| Files: |  RAZ_Tarozo_Mateus_M._2025.pdf (9,19 MB)
MD5: 2F3C6B1244F65FB0AC31E43B167E282C
 https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf092
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Work type: | Scientific work |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
|---|
| Organization: | FNM - Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics
|
|---|
| Abstract: | Quantitative analysis of visual arts has recently expanded to encompass a more extensive array of artworks due to the availability of large-scale digitized art collections. Consistent with formal analyses by art historians, many of these studies highlight the significance of encoding spatial structures within artworks to enhance our understanding of visual arts. However, defining universally applicable, interpretable, and sufficiently simple units that capture the essence of paintings and their artistic styles remains challenging. Here, we examine ordering patterns in pixel intensities within two-by-two partitions of images from nearly 140,000 paintings created over the past 1,000 years. These patterns, categorized into 11 types based on arguments of continuity and symmetry, are both universally applicable and detailed enough to correlate with low-level visual features of paintings. We uncover a universal distribution of these patterns, with consistent prevalence within groups, yet modulated across groups by a nontrivial interplay between pattern smoothness and the likelihood of identical pixel intensities. This finding provides a standardized metric for comparing paintings and styles, further establishing a scale to measure deviations from the average prevalence. Our research also shows that these simple patterns carry valuable information for identifying painting styles, though styles generally exhibit considerable variability in the prevalence of ordinal patterns. Moreover, shifts in the prevalence of these patterns reveal a trend in which artworks increasingly diverge from the average incidence over time; however, this evolution is neither smooth nor uniform, with substantial variability in pattern prevalence, particularly after the 1930s. |
|---|
| Keywords: | spatial patterns, complexity, esthetic measure, art history, social physics |
|---|
| Publication status: | Published |
|---|
| Publication version: | Version of Record |
|---|
| Submitted for review: | 14.06.2024 |
|---|
| Article acceptance date: | 06.02.2025 |
|---|
| Publication date: | 18.03.2025 |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2025 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | 14 str. |
|---|
| Numbering: | Letn. 4, št. 3, št. članka pgaf092 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DKUM-92355  |
|---|
| UDC: | 53 |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 2752-6542 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 230957059 |
|---|
| DOI: | 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf092 |
|---|
| Publication date in DKUM: | 01.04.2025 |
|---|
| Views: | 158 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 10 |
|---|
| Metadata: |    |
|---|
| Categories: | Misc.
|
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Average score: | (0 votes) |
|---|
| Your score: | Voting is allowed only for logged in users. |
|---|
| Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
