| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Zakonska ureditev uporabe konoplje v medicinske in rekreacijske namene - primerjava med Slovenijo in Nevado : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Roškar, Janja (Author)
ID Kraljić, Suzana (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Roskar_Janja_2025.pdf (2,37 MB)
MD5: 3B3954CE5C901328DC8E4C404A235231
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Ljudje konopljo uporabljajo že več tisoč let, v zadnjih 100 letih pa njen pravni status odpira mnoge debate in doživlja velike spremembe. Čeprav je kot rastlina zelo vsestransko uporabna, njeni dolgotrajni učinki na zdravje ljudi še vedno niso popolnoma raziskani, kar vzbuja negotovost pri zakonodajalcih po vsem svetu. Ker pa nekatere raziskave kažejo na določeno korist, se države postopoma odločajo za legalizacijo in regulacijo konoplje v medicinske in rekreacijske namene, pri čemer imajo močan vpliv tudi politične in gospodarske unije, kot je EU, ter zvezne unije, kot so ZDA. Slovenija spada med države, ki še niso popolnoma legalizirale konoplje. Dovoljeno je industrijsko pridelovanje konoplje, glede medicinske in rekreacijske uporabe pa smo še vedno v vmesni coni, kjer dovoljujemo uporabo izdelkov iz konoplje, ki vsebujejo manj kot 0,3 % THC. Izdelki, ki vsebujejo več THC-ja, pa so označeni kot droge. Tako je v medicinske namene mogoče dostopati do določenih zdravil, ki vsebujejo konopljo, rekreacijska uporaba pa je prepovedana in je zanjo predviden tudi kazenski pregon, čeprav je skozi sodno prakso mogoče zaslediti toleranco, v kolikor ne gre za večjo zlorabo. EU na slovensko zakonodajo vpliva precej zmerno. Največji vpliv ima na področju pridelovanja industrijske konoplje ter pri ohranjanju prostega pretoka blaga, na preostalih področjih, ki so v njeni pristojnosti, pa daje okvirne smernice, na podlagi katerih države članice same sprejmejo zakonodajo, ki je lahko tudi strožja. Nevada je zvezna država ZDA, ki dovoljuje gojenje in uporabo konoplje v industrijske namene, prav tako pa je legalizirala konopljo v medicinske in rekreacijske namene in ob tem ustanovila organe, ki so pristojni samo za pravno regulacijo konoplje. Kljub legalizaciji vseeno obstaja možnost kazenskega pregona, v kolikor posamezniki to izkoriščajo ali jo uporabljajo v javnosti, pred upravljanjem vozila ipd. ZDA kot federacija pri sami legalizaciji konoplje niso imele večjega vpliva. Večji problem predstavlja to, da na federalni ravni konoplja še vedno spada na Seznam 1 prepovedanih substanc, kar otežuje finančno poslovanje podjetij, ki se ukvarjajo s konopljo, onemogoča trgovanje med zveznimi državami ter, zaradi morebitnega kazenskega pregona s strani federalnih organov, ustvarja negotovost za prebivalce.
Keywords:industrijska konoplja, marihuana, legalizacija konoplje, uporaba konoplje v medicinske in rekreacijske namene, legalnost gojenja konoplje
Place of publishing:Maribor
Place of performance:Maribor
Publisher:J. Roškar
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (VII, 72 str.))
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-92481 New window
UDC:342.7:582.630.1(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:236492035 New window
Publication date in DKUM:20.05.2025
Views:159
Downloads:153
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:11.04.2025

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Legal regulation of cannabis for medicinal and recreational purposes - a comparative analysis of legislation in slovenia and nevada
Abstract:Cannabis has been used for millennia, and over the past 100 years, its legal status has become the subject of much debate and significant change. While the plant has many uses, its long-term effects on our health are still not fully understood, creating uncer- tainty among legislators worldwide. However, as some research suggests certain bene- fits, countries are gradually deciding to legalize and regulate cannabis for medical and recreational purposes. Political and economic unions such as the EU, and federal unions such as the USA, also exert significant influence on these decisions. Slovenia is one of the countries that has not yet fully legalized cannabis. Industrial can- nabis cultivation is permitted, but in terms of medical and recreational use, the country is still in an intermediate zone, where the use of cannabis products that contain less than 0.3 % THC is allowed, while products that contain higher percentages of THC are classi- fied as drugs. For medical purposes, certain medicines containing cannabis are accessi- ble, but recreational use remains prohibited and is met with criminal prosecution, though case law suggests some tolerance, as long as it is not a major abuse. The EU has a rather moderate influence on Slovenian legislation. Its greatest influence can be seen in the area of industrial hemp cultivation and in maintaining the free movement of goods. In other areas within its jurisdiction the EU provides framework guidelines that member states can adopt, although individual countries may enact stricter laws. The US state of Nevada allows the cultivation and use of cannabis for industrial purposes and has also legalized cannabis for medical and recreational use, while establishing reg- ulatory bodies that are responsible solely for the regulation of cannabis. Despite legali- zation, criminal prosecution is still possible if individuals misuse cannabis in public, drive under the influence, etc. At the federal level, the US did not have a major influence on the legalization of cannabis itself. A bigger problem is that at the federal level, cannabis is still a Schedule 1 controlled substance, which complicates the financial operations of cannabis businesses, prevents interstate trade, and creates uncertainty for residents due to potential federal prosecution.
Keywords:hemp, marijuana, legalization of cannabis, use of cannabis for medical and recreational purposes, legality of growing cannabis


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica