Participativni proračun in njegova uporaba v praksi

Toplak, Timotej

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Participativni proračun in njegova uporaba v praksi
Authors:	ID Toplak, Timotej (Author) ID Markovič Hribernik, Tanja (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UN_Toplak_Timotej_2025.pdf (2,00 MB) MD5: 3375EEBF854190304DA5EC24F387388E
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
Abstract:	Participativni proračun je inovativni mehanizem, ki omogoča neposredno sodelovanje občanov pri odločanju o porabi javnih sredstev na lokalni ravni. V tem diplomskem delu je obravnavana uporaba participativnega proračuna v praksi, s poudarkom na analizi njegove izvedbe v izbranih slovenskih občinah (Maribor, Kranj, Koper, Krško) in primerjava z izkušnjami v izbranih državah Evropske unije (Portugalska, Francija, Italija, Švedska). Namen raziskave je bil preučiti, kako različni dejavniki, kot so institucionalni okviri, politična volja, digitalizacija in vključevanje prebivalcev, vplivajo na uspešnost in učinkovitost participativnega proračuna. V raziskavi so bili podrobno obravnavani ključni elementi, kot so pravna podlaga za izvajanje participativnega proračuna, zgodovina in razvoj participativnega proračuna, vključenost občanov, transparentnost procesov ter vloga digitalnih orodij pri izvedbi. Primerjava med slovenskimi občinami in izbranimi državami EU je razkrila, da čeprav se slovenske občine soočajo s podobnimi izzivi kot tuje, obstajajo pomembne razlike v pristopu in učinkovitosti izvajanja participativnega proračuna. Medtem ko v Sloveniji nekatere občine, kot sta Koper in Krško, dosegajo visoko stopnjo transparentnosti, je ta v nekaterih evropskih mestih, kot je Pariz, kljub večjim finančnim vložkom vprašljiva. Poleg tega je raziskava pokazala, da vloga digitalnih orodij pomembno prispeva k večji dostopnosti in učinkovitosti participativnega proračuna. Digitalizacija omogoča enostavno oddajo predlogov, preglednost glasovanja in povečuje zaupanje občanov v proces. Kljub tem prednostim pa obstajajo še nekatere pomanjkljivosti, kot so omejeno vključevanje marginaliziranih skupin, variabilna stopnja udeležbe in izzivi v fazi evalvacije projektov. Na osnovi raziskave v okviru diplomskega dela menimo, da je smiselno nadalje razvijati področje participativnega proračuna v Sloveniji, s poudarkom na izboljšanju deliberacije, krepitvi sodelovanja z nevladnimi organizacijami ter izboljšanju procesov spremljanja in evalvacije, kar bi lahko pripomoglo k večji uspešnosti in trajnosti tega orodja v prihodnosti.
Keywords:	participativni proračun, občine, Slovenija, države EU
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	T. Toplak]
Year of publishing:	2025
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-93778
UDC:	336.1:352
COBISS.SI-ID:	250032131
Publication date in DKUM:	23.09.2025
Views:	148
Downloads:	28
Metadata:
Categories:	EPF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:	CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:	The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:	20.07.2025

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Participatory budgeting and its application in practice
Abstract:	The participatory budgeting is an innovative mechanism that enables direct citizen participation in decision-making regarding the allocation of public funds at the local level. This thesis examines the practical implementation of the participatory budget, with a focus on analysing its execution in selected Slovenian municipalities (Maribor, Kranj, Koper, Krško) and comparing it with experiences from selected European Union countries (Portugal, France, Italy, Sweden). The research aimed to explore how various factors, such as institutional frameworks, political will, digitization, and citizen involvement, influence the success and effectiveness of participatory budgeting. The study thoroughly examined key elements such as the legal basis for implementing participatory budgeting, the history and development of participatory budgeting, citizen involvement, process transparency, and the role of digital tools in its execution. A comparison between Slovenian municipalities and selected EU countries revealed that although Slovenian municipalities face similar challenges as their foreign counterparts, there are significant differences in the approach and effectiveness of participatory budget implementation. While some Slovenian municipalities, like Koper and Krško, achieve high levels of transparency, it is questionable in some European cities, such as Paris, despite larger financial investments. Additionally, the research demonstrated that the role of digital tools significantly contributes to greater accessibility and effectiveness of participatory budgeting. Digitization enables easy submission of proposals, voting transparency, and increases citizens' trust in the process. Despite these advantages, there are still some shortcomings, such as limited inclusion of marginalized groups, variable participation rates, and challenges in the project evaluation phase. The thesis suggests the further development of participatory budgeting in Slovenia, with an emphasis on enhancing deliberation, strengthening collaboration with non-governmental organizations, and improving monitoring and evaluation processes. These improvements could contribute to the increased success and sustainability of this tool in the future.
Keywords:	participatory budgeting, municipalities, Slovenia, EU countries

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back