| Title: | The mix matters : exploring the interplay between epistemic and zetetic norms in scientific disagreement |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Justin, Martin (Author)
ID Šešelja, Dunja (Author)
ID Straßer, Christian (Author)
ID Trpin, Borut (Author) |
|---|
| Files: |  RAZ_Justin_Martin_2025.pdf (1,33 MB)
MD5: AF6BE07F727BC9A03607262DE373400E
 https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10.1086/737742
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Work type: | Scientific work |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
|---|
| Organization: | FF - Faculty of Arts
|
|---|
| Abstract: | What is the rational response to a scientific disagreement? Many epistemologists argue that disagreement with an epistemic peer should generally lead to conciliation by lowering confidence in the disputed belief or even suspending judgment altogether. Although this conciliatory approach is widely regarded as a norm of individual rationality, its value in the context of collective scientific inquiry is less clear. Some have even raised concerns that conciliating in scientific disagreements may slow progress or reduce the efficiency of inquiry. In this article,we introduce a novel agent-based model that captures key aspects of scientific disagreement by incorporating both epistemic norms, which govern belief revision, and zetetic norms, which guide how scientists pursue inquiry. Our results indicate that the effects of conciliating in the face of disagreement—whether detrimental or beneficial—depend on the zetetic norms that scientists follow. When scientists focus on exploiting the hypothesis that they believe is most likely to succeed, remaining steadfast is more effective. However, with exploratory scientists, conciliation does not negatively affect group performance. These findings highlight the critical role of zetetic norms in determining the rational response to disagreement in scientific practice. |
|---|
| Keywords: | scientific disagreement, scientific inquiry, agent-based modeling, Zetetic norms, Bandit models, peer disagreement |
|---|
| Publication status: | In print |
|---|
| Publication version: | Author Accepted Manuscript |
|---|
| Publication date: | 01.01.2025 |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2025 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | str. 1-32 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DKUM-94047  |
|---|
| UDC: | 167 |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 1464-3537 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 244139779 |
|---|
| DOI: | 10.1086/737742 |
|---|
| Publication date in DKUM: | 27.08.2025 |
|---|
| Views: | 137 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 12 |
|---|
| Metadata: |    |
|---|
| Categories: | Misc.
|
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Average score: | (0 votes) |
|---|
| Your score: | Voting is allowed only for logged in users. |
|---|
| Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
