| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Vpliv uporabe različnih dušikovih gnojil na pridelek soje : diplomsko delo
Authors:ID Družovec, Bine (Author)
ID Jakop, Manfred (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Titan, Primož (Comentor)
Files:.pdf VS_Druzovec_Bine_2025.pdf (2,66 MB)
MD5: FEA1D8AF1AA59BFC8FF590CC1B24699D
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FKBV - Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Abstract:V diplomskem delu je bil raziskan vpliv različnih oblik dušikovih gnojil na pridelek soje (Glycine max L.). Kljub sposobnosti soje, da s pomočjo simbiotskih bakterij Rhizobium veže atmosferski dušik, se v praksi pogosto izpostavljajo dileme glede smiselnosti dodatnega dognojevanja z dušikom. Poseben poudarek je bil namenjen primerjavi tradicionalnih gnojil (KAN, urea) in alternativnih metod prehrane rastlin, kot jih omogočajo nanognojila (nanourea 4 % in 20 %) ob različnih načinih aplikacije. Poljski poskus je bil izveden v Spodnjih Verjanah v letu 2024 po sistemu naključnih blokov s petimi obravnavanji in štirimi ponovitvami. Spremljan je bil vpliv gnojil na pridelek zrnja, vsebnost vlage ob žetvi, število koreninskih nodulov, maso rastlin, žetveni indeks ter ostanek mineralnega dušika v tleh. Statistično značilne razlike v pridelku zrnja med posameznimi načini dognojevanja niso bile ugotovljene, kar nakazuje, da dodatek dušika pri ustrezni nodulaciji ni nujno potreben. Nadalje ugotavljamo, da dognojevanje z ureo in nanognojili pridelka ni zmanjšalo v primerjavi s KAN-om, pri čemer je bil učinek delovanja nanouree ocenjen kot enakovreden klasični urei. Značilno največji žetveni indeks je bil dosežen pri uporabi foliarne aplikacije uree. Najvišje število nodulov je bilo zabeleženo pri kontrolnem obravnavanju brez dodanega dušika, kar potrjuje zaviralni učinek dodatnega dušika na simbiotsko vezavo. Raziskava potrjuje, da v optimalnih pogojih dodajanje dušika soji ni upravičeno, v razmerah, ki omejujejo vezavo zračnega dušika, pa je uporaba dušika v nanoobliki enakovredna ali celo bolj učinkovita v primerjavi z drugimi načini in oblikami dušikovih gnojil.
Keywords:soja, dušik, nanognojila, pridelek
Place of publishing:Maribor
Place of performance:Maribor
Publisher:B. Družovec
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (VII, 38 str.))
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-94123 New window
UDC:633.34.067:631.84(043.2)=163.6
COBISS.SI-ID:247613955 New window
Publication date in DKUM:04.09.2025
Views:244
Downloads:73
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FKBV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:04.08.2025

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The effect of different nitrogen fertilizers on soybean yield
Abstract:In this thesis, the impact of different forms of nitrogen fertilizers on soybean (Glycine max L.) yield was investigated. Despite the soybean’s ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen through symbiotic Rhizobium bacteria, practical concerns often arise regarding the necessity of additional nitrogen fertilization. Special emphasis was placed on the comparison between traditional fertilizers (CAN, urea) and alternative plant nutrition strategies enabled by nanofertilizers (nano urea 4-% and 20-%) in different application methods. The field experiment was conducted in Spodnje Verjane in 2024 using a randomized block design with five treatments and four replications. The influence of fertilizers on grain yield, harvest moisture content, number of nodules, plant biomass, harvest index, and residual mineral nitrogen in the soil was monitored. No statistically significant differences in grain yield were observed among the fertilization treatments, indicating that nitrogen supplementation may not be necessary when nodulation is adequate. Furthermore, it was found that fertilization with urea and nanofertilizers did not reduce the yield compared to CAN, and the effect of nano urea was assessed as equivalent to conventional urea. The highest harvest index was achieved via a foliar application of urea. The highest number of nodules was recorded in the control treatment without added nitrogen, confirming the inhibitory effect of additional nitrogen on biological nitrogen fixation. The research confirms that under optimal conditions, nitrogen addition in soybean production is not justified. However, under conditions that limit nitrogen fixation, the use of nitrogen in nano form is equally or even more effective compared to other types and forms of nitrogen fertilizers.
Keywords:soybean, nitrogen, nano fertilizers, yield


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica