Umestitev elektronskih dokazov med dokazna sredstva pravdnega postopka

Zahrastnik, Kristjan

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Umestitev elektronskih dokazov med dokazna sredstva pravdnega postopka
Authors:	ID Zahrastnik, Kristjan (Author)
Files:	Umestitev+elektronskih+dokazov+med+dokazna+sredstva+pravdnega+postopka.pdf (488,03 KB) MD5: C2BAB1DB7EAA383E7D2B26D5B07775B3
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Unknown
Typology:	1.16 - Independent Scientific Component Part or a Chapter in a Monograph
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Svojevrstna narava elektronskih dokazov botruje k temu, da jih ne moremo jasno in enostavno umestiti med eno izmed vrst tradicionalnih dokaznih sredstev, ki jih predvideva Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP). Elektronski dokazi so po svoji naravi zapisani na elektronskem nosilcu in so tako v izvorni obliki neberljivi, zaradi česar se za izvedbo dokaza elektronske narave zahteva ustrezno znanje in uporaba tehnoloških pripomočkov. Ker trenutna normativna ureditev dokaznih pravil v ZPP posebej ne ureja posebnosti elektronskih dokazov, se elektronske dokaze po analogiji umešča med tradicionalna dokazna sredstva pravdnega postopka. Med katera dokazna sredstva se umeščajo, ZPP ne daje izrecnega odgovora. Vsled temu je namen prispevka proučitev, med katera dokazna sredstva umeščamo najpogostejše vrste elektronskih dokazov in ali je trenutna ureditev glede na svojevrstnost elektronskih dokazov ustrezna.
Keywords:	elektronski dokazi, dokazna sredstva, pravdni postopek, umestitev elektronskih dokazov, listina, ogled
Publication version:	Version of Record
Year of publishing:	2024
Number of pages:	Str. 97-122
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-94409
UDC:	347.95
COBISS.SI-ID:	182170883
DOI:	10.18690/um.pf.1.2024.4
Publication date in DKUM:	18.08.2025
Views:	160
Downloads:	29
Metadata:
Categories:	Misc.
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a monograph

Title:	Studia Iuridica Miscellanea : MMXXI
Editors:	Martina Repas
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
Year of publishing:	2024
ISBN:	978-961-286-817-8
COBISS.SI-ID:	179685123

Licences

License:	CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:	The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Classification of electronic evidence between means of proof of contentious civil procedure
Abstract:	The peculiar nature of electronic evidence contributes to the fact that electronic evidence cannot be clearly categorised among the traditional means of proof provided by the Slovenian Contentious Civil Procedure Act (CCPA). Electronic evidence is stored on an electronic medium and, therefore, is not directly readable. For this reason, the presentation of electronic documents requires technical knowledge and technical devices. The current normative regulation of evidentiary rules in the CCPA lacks a special regulation for electronic evidence; as a result, they are, by analogy, applied among the traditional means of proof of contentious civil proceedings. The CCPA does not state explicitly how they are classified as means of proof. Consequently, the purpose of the contribution is to examine which means of proof are applicable to the most common types of electronic evidence and whether the current regulation, considering the peculiarity of the electronic evidence, is appropriate.
Keywords:	illegally obtained evidence, the right to evidence, rights in conflict, the principle of proportionality, practical concordance, civil litigation

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back