| Title: | Mapping the evolution of social innovation in scientific publications : a topic modelling and text mining approach |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Godnov, Uroš (Author)
ID Hojnik, Jana (Author)
ID Kustec, Simona (Author) |
|---|
| Files: |  https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/orga-2025-0016
 RAZ_Godnov_Uros_2025.pdf (1,85 MB)
MD5: C0491042035920415E4E262A8C3C4AA4
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Work type: | Unknown |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
|---|
| Organization: | FOV - Faculty of Organizational Sciences in Kranj
|
|---|
| Abstract: | Objective: To trace how academic discourse on social innovation has evolved from 2000 – mid-2024 in numbers and leading topics by applying a special topic modelling and text mining methodology. Data & Sources: 4,703 full-text journal articles retrieved from Science Direct. Methods: Literature review and PDF text extracted with PyPDF2 and pdfplumber; cleaned and tokenised in R; topic modelling performed with Latent Dirichlet Allocation (ldatuning-optimised); temporal and correlation analyses visualised via tidyverse. Results: The number of publications increased significantly from 16 (in 2000) to 573 (in 2021), stabilizing thereafter. Seven dominant topics emerged: renewable energy, environmental/resource management, smart-city governance, sustainable food systems, corporate strategy, academic-method studies, and social-governance structures. “Social” and “innovation” became the top word pair after 2006; energy-related terms surged after 2016. Surprisingly, topics typically considered ‘social’ have not dominated the social innovation discourse in scientific communities compared to the aforementioned dominant topics. Discussion: Our results largely confirm existing findings from literature reviews and affirm the interdisciplinary, vague, contested, and still intensively evolving nature of social innovation. Dominant social innovation topics in scientific papers reference to social innovation topics in global political and policy documents, notably from the EU (from 2013 onwards) and the 2015 UN SDGs agenda, also emphasising collaboration between scientific, business, political and non-governmental stakeholders, and can thus serve as scientific, evidence-based advocacy for other stakeholders involved in social innovation processes. Conclusions: Social innovation research is now an established, systemic, and broadly interdisciplinary field of study, focusing on sustainability, emerging technologies, and governance topics. It is tightly connected with the political and policy agendas of leading international organisations, as well as business and non-governmental ones. Implications: Findings guide scholars to under-explored social-related content and niches (such as governance and, especially, equity topics) and help policymakers and other stakeholders involved in social innovation processes locate evidence-based approaches and clusters when designing their socially innovative responses, interventions, solutions, and measures. |
|---|
| Keywords: | social innovation theories, global policy agenda, text mining, topic modelling, literature review |
|---|
| Publication date: | 01.08.2025 |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2025 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | str. 267-282 |
|---|
| Numbering: | Vol. 58, issue 3 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DKUM-95132  |
|---|
| UDC: | 001.895 |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 1581-1832 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 245734403 |
|---|
| DOI: | 10.2478/orga-2025-0016 |
|---|
| Publication date in DKUM: | 05.09.2025 |
|---|
| Views: | 165 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 9 |
|---|
| Metadata: |    |
|---|
| Categories: | Misc.
|
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Average score: | (0 votes) |
|---|
| Your score: | Voting is allowed only for logged in users. |
|---|
| Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
