| Title: | Ethical approval and informed consent in mental health research : a scoping review |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Cilar Budler, Leona (Author)
ID Štiglic, Gregor (Author) |
|---|
| Files: |  https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-025-02364-0
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Work type: | Scientific work |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.02 - Review Article |
|---|
| Organization: | FZV - Faculty of Health Sciences
|
|---|
| Abstract: | Although there is a wide range of scientific papers introducing artificial intelligence techniques in the mental health field, there is a lack of literature assessing the reporting of ethical concerns in such studies. In addition, it is not yet known whether the authors seek ethical approval or informed consent while performing such research. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which studies in the mental health domain that utilize chatbots either ignore or incompletely disclose patient consent and ethical approval from the responsible review boards. A scoping literature search was performed in PsychARTICLES, PubMed, and Web of Science using both MeSH terms and free-text keywords. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we also contacted study authors to verify missing information about ethical approval or informed consent, enhancing the transparency and rigor of our analysis. Among the 27 studies reviewed, 13 reported obtaining ethical approval, and 16 reported collecting informed consent. The remaining studies did not provide such information. These findings underscore the ethical complexities surrounding AI in mental health, especially regarding the collection, storage, and use of sensitive patient data. There is a correlation between sample size and the acquisition of ethical approval, particularly in studies published in journals with low-impact factors. Future research should investigate the role of journal policies in influencing ethical practices. In addition, training programs could be developed to educate researchers on the importance of ethics, particularly in studies with smaller sample sizes. |
|---|
| Keywords: | artificial intelligence, mental well-being, literature review, ethical issues, patient consent |
|---|
| Publication status: | Published |
|---|
| Publication version: | Version of Record |
|---|
| Submitted for review: | 13.01.2025 |
|---|
| Article acceptance date: | 09.04.2025 |
|---|
| Publication date: | 01.05.2025 |
|---|
| Publisher: | Springer |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2025 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | str. 6571-6588 |
|---|
| Numbering: | Letn. 40 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DKUM-95980  |
|---|
| UDC: | 004.8:616.89:17 |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 1435-5655 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 235256323 |
|---|
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00146-025-02364-0 |
|---|
| Publication date in DKUM: | 18.11.2025 |
|---|
| Views: | 193 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 5 |
|---|
| Metadata: |    |
|---|
| Categories: | Misc.
|
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Average score: | (0 votes) |
|---|
| Your score: | Voting is allowed only for logged in users. |
|---|
| Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
