| Title: | Long-term effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) corporate practices on corporate stock performance |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Minev, Svetlin (Author) ID Dankova, Petya (Author) ID Štrukelj, Tjaša (Author) |
| Files: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11321
RAZ_Minev_Svetlin_2025.pdf (1,06 MB) MD5: 44988042DB6119F4B933463C2CF9615C
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Work type: | Scientific work |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
|---|
| Organization: | EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
|
|---|
| Abstract: | In the context of the growing prominence of socially responsible investment, the debate over whether sustainable corporate practices translate into sustained shareholder value has intensified. As a key tool for aligning their investment portfolios with responsible/sustainable corporate practices, investors rely on listed companies’ Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings. This study aims to investigate the long-term impact of ESG practices on the stock performance of listed companies. We perform a Q1 2000–Q1 2025 backtest to analyse the comparative performance of a Best-in-Class ESG portfolio, constructed by the top 30 listed companies with market capitalisations above USD 2 billion ranked by Morningstar Sustainalytics’ ESG Risk Ratings as of 31 March 2025 against the S&P 500 Total Return index. We found that ESG leaders exhibited superior risk-adjusted performance, outperforming the S&P 500 Total Return Index. The BiC portfolios achieved a substantially higher CAGR and Sharpe ratio, while maintaining maximum drawdowns that remained comparable to the benchmark S&P 500 Total Return index. We also found that ESG advantages were more pronounced in market downturns, with the Best-in-Class ESG portfolio showing better CAGR and Sortino ratios. The findings of this study demonstrate that responsible governance and management create benefits for all stakeholders, including investors, society and nature, in the broadest sense of these terms. |
|---|
| Keywords: | Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) principles, ESG ratings, stock market, corporate financial performance, portfolio management, sustainable investment, socially responsible investment, corporate governance, sustainability |
|---|
| Publication status: | Published |
|---|
| Publication version: | Version of Record |
|---|
| Submitted for review: | 12.11.2025 |
|---|
| Article acceptance date: | 12.12.2025 |
|---|
| Publication date: | 17.12.2025 |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2025 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | str. 1-22 |
|---|
| Numbering: | Vol. 17, issue 24, spec. iss., [art. no.] 11321 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DKUM-96414  |
|---|
| UDC: | 005.3 |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 2071-1050 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 263524355  |
|---|
| DOI: | 10.3390/su172411321  |
|---|
| Publication date in DKUM: | 06.01.2026 |
|---|
| Views: | 212 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 6 |
|---|
| Metadata: |  |
|---|
| Categories: | Misc.
|
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Average score: | (0 votes) |
|---|
| Your score: | Voting is allowed only for logged in users. |
|---|
| Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |