| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Policijsko delo v skupnosti : primerjava med Slovenijo in Hrvaško
Authors:ID Šobot, Boško (Author)
ID Lobnikar, Branko (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf VS_Sobot_Bosko_2026.pdf (896,53 KB)
MD5: 625EC948DADC7B5BCEAEC80DC7708DFB
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Diplomsko delo obravnava policijsko delo v skupnosti (PDvS) kot sodoben pristop k zagotavljanju javne varnosti, ki se je v Sloveniji in na Hrvaškem začel uveljavljati v devetdesetih letih prejšnjega stoletja. Model PDvS se je razvil kot odziv na družbene spremembe po osamosvojitvi obeh držav ter kot potreba po povečanju legitimnosti policije, krepitvi zaupanja prebivalcev in partnerskem sodelovanju pri reševanju varnostnih izzivov. V Sloveniji je PDvS institucionalno umeščen v zakonodajni okvir, zlasti v Zakon o nalogah in pooblastilih policije (ZNPPol) ter Zakon o organiziranosti in delu v policiji (ZODPol). Organizacijsko se izvaja prek vodij policijskih okolišev, ki so odgovorni za neposredno komunikacijo z lokalnim prebivalstvom, zaznavanje varnostnih problemov ter izvajanje preventivnih aktivnosti. Pomembno vlogo imajo tudi lokalni varnostni sveti, ki združujejo predstavnike občin, šol, zdravstvenih ustanov in civilne družbe ter omogočajo usklajevanje varnostnih politik. Na Hrvaškem je PDvS opredeljeno v Zakonu o policijskim poslovima i ovlastima ter v strateškem dokumentu Strategija djelovanja policije u zajednici. V praksi ga izvajajo kontaktni policisti, ki delujejo v okviru lokalnih postaj in so zadolženi za vzpostavljanje stika z občani, zbiranje informacij ter sodelovanje pri preventivnih projektih. Poleg tega se PDvS izvaja prek nacionalnih kampanj, kot so Zdrav za 5, Manje oružja – manje tragedija, Sigurna turistička destinacija in Živim život bez nasilja. Primerjalna analiza pokaže, da je slovenski model bolj strukturiran in formaliziran, medtem ko je hrvaški izraziteje projektno usmerjen in centraliziran. V obeh državah pa je skupna značilnost poudarek na proaktivnem delovanju, preventivi ter partnerskem odnosu med policijo in lokalnimi skupnostmi. Raziskave potrjujejo, da prebivalci pozitivno zaznavajo prisotnost policistov, njihovo dostopnost in pripravljenost za sodelovanje, kar prispeva k večjemu občutku varnosti in zaupanju v policijo kot institucijo.
Keywords:policijsko delo, policijsko delo v skupnosti, primerjave, diplomske naloge
Geographic coverage:Slovenija; Hrvaška;
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:B. Šobot
Year of publishing:2026
Year of performance:2026
Number of pages:IX f., 47 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-96972 New window
UDC:351.741(497.4)(497.5)(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:279584771 New window
Publication date in DKUM:27.05.2026
Views:187
Downloads:21
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:08.02.2026

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Community policing: a comparison between Slovenia and Croatia : diplomsko delo visokošolskega študijskega programa Varnost in policijsko delo
Abstract:This thesis examines community policing (CP) as a modern approach to ensuring public safety, which began to be implemented in Slovenia and Croatia in the 1990s. The CP model emerged as a response to social changes following independence in both countries and as a need to enhance police legitimacy, strengthen public trust, and establish partnerships in addressing security challenges. In Slovenia, CP is institutionally embedded in the legislative framework, particularly in the Police Tasks and Powers Act (ZNPPol) and the Police Organization and Work Act (ZODPol). It is organized through neighborhood police officers, who are responsible for direct communication with residents, identifying security problems, and implementing preventive activities. Local safety councils also play an important role, bringing together representatives of municipalities, schools, health institutions, and civil society to coordinate security policies. In Croatia, CP is defined in the Police Duties and Powers Act and the strategic document Community Policing Strategy. In practice, it is carried out by contact police officers working within local stations, tasked with establishing communication with citizens, gathering information, and participating in preventive projects. CP is also implemented through national campaigns such as Healthy for 5, Less Weapons – Less Tragedies, Safe Tourist Destination, and Living a Life Without Violence. The comparative analysis shows that the Slovenian model is more structured and formalized, while the Croatian approach is more project-oriented and centralized. In both countries, however, the common feature is the emphasis on proactive action, prevention, and partnership between the police and local communities. Research confirms that citizens positively perceive the presence, accessibility, and willingness of police officers to cooperate, which contributes to a greater sense of security and trust in the police as an institution.
Keywords:community policing, Slovenia, Croatia


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica