| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Terorizmi in (drugi) ekstremizmi
Authors:ID Klampfer, Friderik (Author)
Files:.pdf RAZ_Klampfer_Friderik_2024.pdf (650,40 KB)
MD5: 5BE218E384FCD5ECB38665A73BC04D0D
 
URL https://journals.um.si/index.php/analiza/article/view/4895/3227
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Scientific work
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
UZUM - University of Maribor Press
Abstract:V pričujočem članku zasleduje avtor dva cilja –najprej podati delovno definicijo terorizma, nato pa kritično ovrednotiti argumentacijske strategije, ki vodijo do njegove skoraj soglasne moralne obsodbe. V zvezi s prvim zagovarja potrebam moralnega ovrednotenja prikrojeno definicijo terorizma kot ne-razlikovalne uporabe nasilja – ali resno mišljene grožnje z njim – z namenom/ciljem (od oblasti) izsiliti bolj ali manj korenite politične oz. družbene spremembe. V zvezi z drugim priznava, da si teroristi z načrtnim fizičnim in psihičnim nasiljem nad civilisti naprtijo težko moralno breme, a dokazuje, da terorizem v tem ni pomembno drugačen od drugih, praviloma toleriranih in neredko celo slavljenih in občudovanih vrst politično motiviranega nasilja, od oboroženih uporov in revolucij do državljanskih in meddržavnih vojn. Ali se bo terorizem pod navedenim moralnim bremenom nazadnje zlomil ali ne, bo v prvi vrsti odvisno od konkretne utemeljitve, tolmačenja in uporabe načela imunosti civilistov – ta naloga pa se popremisleku izkaže za precej trši oreh, kot dajeta slutiti njegova samoumevnost in vsesplošna popularnost. In končno, za enačenje terorizma in ekstremizma ni prepričljivih razlogov, sploh če pomislimo, koliko strpnejši smo do drugih pojavnih oblik politično motiviranega nasilja, ki so terorizmu v najboljšem primeru moralno enakovredne ali pa še to ne.
Keywords:terorizem, nasilje, ustrahovanje, načelo razlikovanja, teorija pravične vojne, ekstremizem
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:30.12.2024
Publisher:Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
Year of publishing:2024
Number of pages:48
Numbering:Letn. 28, št. 1
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-97160 New window
UDC:17
ISSN on article:2712-4916
COBISS.SI-ID:224754947 New window
DOI:10.18690/analiza.28.1.3-50.2024 New window
Publication date in DKUM:20.02.2026
Views:165
Downloads:6
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Analiza : časopis za kritično misel
Shortened title:Analiza
Publisher:Društvo za analitično filozofijo in filozofijo znanosti, Društvo za analitično filozofijo in filozofijo znanosti, Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
ISSN:1408-2969
COBISS.SI-ID:67716608 New window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Terrorism and (other) extremisms
Abstract:The article pursues two goals: to provide a working definition of terrorism and to critically evaluate the argumentative strategies leading to its near-universal moral condemnation. The author advocates for a definition of terrorism tailored to the needs of moral evaluation: the indiscriminate use of violence—or the serious threat thereof—with the aim or purpose of coercing (authorities) into implementing more or less radical political or social changes. Regarding the second, the author acknowledges that terrorists, through deliberate, but indiscriminate physical and psychological violence, assume a heavy moral burden. However, the argument is made that terrorism is not significantly different in this respect from other forms of politically motivated violence that are generally tolerated or even celebrated and admired, such as armed uprisings, and wars. Whether terrorism ultimately collapses under this moral burden will depend on the concrete justification, interpretation, and application of the principle of civilian immunity—a task far more challenging upon reflection than its commonly assumed. Finally, there are no compelling reasons to equate terrorism with extremism, especially when one considers how much more lenient we are toward other forms of politically motivated violence, which are, at best, morally equivalent to terrorism and, at worst, inferior.
Keywords:terrorism, violence, intimidation, civilian immunity, Just War theory, extremism


Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. Analiza

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica