| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Procedural balance or structural disadvantage? Legal remedies and defence rights in European Investigation Order
Authors:ID Kordiš, Teodora (Author)
Files:.pdf 1-Kordis.pdf (1,38 MB)
MD5: A2976331093FC96450F4461D43C5253D
 
Language:English
Work type:Unknown
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:As cross-border crime has increased, obtaining evidence from abroad has become crucial to effective prosecution. EU cross-border cooperation for evidence gathering has evolved from mutual legal assistance to instruments such as the European Investigation Order (EIO), which combines mutual assistance and mutual recognition and has significantly accelerated procedures. However, despite its advanced and structured regulation, the position of the defence in the EIO procedures remains uncertain in some countries. Directive 2014/41/EU does not provide a sufficient legal basis for the defence to issue an EIO independently, nor does it establish an explicit right to appeal against its issuance or execution. Although fundamental rights under the EU Charter and the ECHR apply to EIO proceedings, these standards are broadly framed and allow national discretion. The CJEU has taken a step forward, notably in Gavanozov II, highlighting the importance of legal remedies in EIO proceedings. Nonetheless, national criminal procedures still differ in key aspects, and significant gaps remain at the EU level in ensuring effective defence rights.
Keywords:European Investigation Order, mutual recognition, adversarial proceedings, rights of defence, ECHR, effective legal remedy
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:01.06.2026
Year of publishing:2026
Number of pages:str. 1-47
Numbering:Vol. 18, no. 1
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-98883 New window
UDC:343.1:341
ISSN on article:1855-7155
COBISS.SI-ID:284700931 New window
DOI:10.18690/lexonomica.18.1.1-47.2026 New window
Publication date in DKUM:17.07.2026
Views:183
Downloads:4
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Lexonomica : revija za pravo in ekonomijo
Publisher:Pravna fakulteta, Pravna fakulteta, University of Maribor Press
ISSN:1855-7155
COBISS.SI-ID:246384384 New window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Abstract:Z naraščanjem čezmejnega kriminala je pridobivanje dokazov iz tujine postalo eden ključnih vidikov učinkovitega kazenskega pregona. Sodelovanje med državami članicami Evropske unije se je postopoma razvijalo od sistema medsebojne pravne pomoči do uvedbe evropskega preiskovalnega naloga (EPN), ki združuje elemente medsebojne pomoči in načela vzajemnega priznavanja ter je bistveno pospešil in poenostavil pridobivanje dokazov v čezmejnih primerih. Navkljub novi ureditvi pa položaj obrambe v okviru EPN ostaja nejasen in mestoma negotov. Direktiva 2014/41/EU namreč ne zagotavlja zadostne pravne podlage, da bi obramba lahko samostojno izdala EPN, prav tako pa ne določa izrecne pravice do pritožbe zoper njegovo izdajo ali izvršitev. Čeprav se temeljne pravice iz Listine EU in EKČP uporabljajo tudi v postopkih z EPN, so ti standardi oblikovani široko in dopuščajo nacionalno diskrecijo. Sodišče Evropske unije je naredilo korak naprej, zlasti v zadevi Gavanozov II, in poudarilo pomen pravnih sredstev tudi v postopkih z EPN. Kljub temu se nacionalni kazenski postopki še vedno razlikujejo v ključnih vidikih, pomembne vsebinske vrzeli pa pri zagotavljanju učinkovitega varstva pravic obrambe na ravni EU še vedno ostajajo v postopkih z EPN.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica