| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:PRILAGODITEV TRŽNIH DEJAVNOSTI DRŽAVNIH MONOPOLOV PRAVILOM NOTRANJEGA TRGA EU
Authors:ID Milošević, Svetlana (Author)
ID Hojnik, Janja (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Milosevic_Svetlana_2010.pdf (248,05 KB)
MD5: 0EB223D2A41D2D89A4E9953D4898C6BE
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/8a15127c-54e3-4312-97e1-1317bbdeee52
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Diplomska naloga »Prilagoditev tržnih dejavnosti državnih monopolov pravilom notranjega trga EU« predstavlja analizo usklajenosti ekskluzivnih nabavnih in prodajnih pravic državnih monopolov tržne narave s pravili notranjega trga Evropske unije. Pravo Evropske unije v okviru splošne gospodarske pobude in razvoja tržne dejavnosti prepoveduje javno-pravnim subjektom tržnega značaja postavljanje nedovoljenih mej in zapiranje določenih delov notranjega trga. Da bi ti subjekti delovali skladno s pravili notranjega trga Evropske unije, mora biti njihovo delovanje prilagojeno na način, ki izključuje vsakršno diskriminacijo med državami članicami in omogoča potrošnikom v državi monopola dostop do proizvodov v pogojih poštene tržne konkurence. Sodišče Evropske unije je skozi sodno prakso dokazalo, da je delovanje zadevnih monopolov oblikovalo dve obliki prepovedane diskriminacije: diskriminacijo proizvodov, ki ne zahteva odprave s strani države dodeljenih ekskluzivnih pravic državnemu monopolu, zadostuje le identična obravnava domačih in tujih proizvodov, ter diskriminacijo tržnih subjektov držav članic, ki pa zahteva odpravo dodeljene izključne pravice, ker pravni akt, ki to pravico pridržuje domačim subjektom, s tem neposredno škoduje subjektom iz drugih držav članic glede izvajanja njihove gospodarske dejavnosti. V novejši sodni praksi, predvsem zadevi Rosengren, Sodišče Evropske unije krči možnost držav članic, da uporabljajo državne monopole za zasledovanje ciljev javnih interesov. Določeno ekskluzivno pravico pa lahko kljub temu, na podlagi pogojev iz člena 106 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, tudi opravičimo in opredelimo za skladno z notranjim trgom Evropske unije. Diplomska naloga pa v zadnjem delu izpostavlja vključitev rešitev iz zadeve Hanner v slovenski nacionalni prostor in s tem prilagoditev slovenskega monopola nad prodajo cepiv pravilom notranjega trga Evropske unije.
Keywords:notranji trg EU, državni monopoli tržne narave, prepoved diskriminacije, izjeme po členu 106(2) PDEU, državni monopoli nad zdravili
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[S. Milošević]
Year of publishing:2010
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-13843 New window
UDC:34(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:4079147 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:4WYB0VKK
Publication date in DKUM:06.05.2010
Views:2601
Downloads:227
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:“Adjustment of state monopolies’ commercial activities to the EU internal market regulations”
Abstract:The thesis entitled “Adjustment of state monopolies’ commercial activities to the EU internal market regulations” presents an analysis of the conformity of state monopolies of commercial characters’ exclusive purchase and distribution rights with the EU internal market regulations. Namely, the EU law in the context of economic initiative and market activities does not allow public legal bodies of a commercial character to set prohibited borders and isolate certain parts of the internal market. In order for these bodies to operate in accordance with the EU internal market regulations, their activities have to be adapted in a manner that excludes any discrimination among Member States and enables the consumer in the state where the monopoly is taking place access to goods under conditions of fair market competition. With its case-law the Court of Justice of the European Union proved that the activities of these monopolies formed two types of prohibited discrimination. The first one is the discrimination of goods that does not demand a suppression of exclusive rights, awarded to the state monopoly by the state; all that is necessary is an identical treatment of both home-made and imported goods. The second type is the discrimination against the market bodies of the Member States that demands a suppression of exclusive rights on the basis of a legal act that provides such right to domestic bodies and by that impairs the bodies from other Member States regarding their economic performance. In the newer case-law, especially in the Rosengren case, the Court of Justice of the European Union reduces the opportunity of Member States to use state monopolies for pursuing goals of public interests. However, on the basis of Article 106 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU a certain exclusive right may nevertheless be justified and classified as consistent with the EU internal market. The last part of the thesis highlights the inclusion of the Hanner case findings into the Slovenian national spot and by that adapting the Slovenian monopoly of sales of vaccine to the EU internal market regulations.
Keywords:EU internal market, state monopolies of commercial character, prohibition of discrimination, exceptions under Article 106(2) TFEU, state monopolies of medicinal products


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica