| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:Netspeak
Authors:ID Burič, Tina (Author)
ID Šabec, Nada (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Buric_Tina_2011.pdf (656,44 KB)
MD5: BB3EF356B3D861AB8139C861EAAE7488
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/d48103c9-7066-4b15-8fa9-8fdc1c268a7c
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:V zadnjih letih je internet prevzel nadzor nad našimi življenji in hitro nadomestil tradicionalne oblike sporazumevanja. Splet je postal mesto, kjer najlažje najdemo informacije ali pa preživljamo prosti čas. Večina jezikoslovcev meni, da internet slabo vpliva na jezik oz. na njegovo prihodnost. Bojijo se namreč, da bo jezik zaradi vse pogostejše uporabe internetnega slenga izgubil standarde in da se bo zmanjšala jezikovna ustvarjalnost, saj globalizacija vsiljuje enakost. Nekatere od teh napovedi so se že uresničile, saj obstajajo številni primeri uporabe internetnega slenga v formalnih oblikah pisanja, vendar pa na drugi strani jezikoslovci kot npr. David Crystal trdijo, da ni razloga za paniko. Pravi, da internetni sleng daje jeziku možnost za inovacije in nove načine izražanja. Ugotovila sem, da je internetni sleng, za katerega v diplomi uporabljam angleški izraz Netspeak, mešanica pisnega in govornega jezika, obenem pa vsebuje tudi nekatere lastnosti, ki so značilne samo za jezik, ki se uporablja v računalniško podprtem komuniciranju. Spletno klepetanje od uporabniko zahteva hitrost, saj skušajo klepetalci posnemati govorjen jezik. Pri tem so omejeni na računalniško tipkovnico, zato morajo ustvariti način, na katerega posnemajo govorjeni jezik. Rezultat tega je uporaba takšnega pisnega jezika, ki je simulacija govorjenega. Tega se klepetalci ne učijo v šoli, ampak si to sposobnost pridobijo s časom in prakso. Ponavadi to pomeni, da začnejo uporabljati smeške, ter razne oblike krajšanja besed. Medtem ko smeški simulirajo različna čustvena stanja in s tem nadomestijo pomanjkanje neverbalne komunikacija, ki je tako pomembna; krajšanja besed služijo hitrejši komunikaciji. Internetni sleng je sicer bolj podoben pisnemu jeziku, vendar mu ni identičen. Prav tako ni enak govoru, ampak selektivno in prilagodljivo vsebuje značilnosti obeh. Torej je agregat govornega in pisnega jezika. Namen moje seminarske naloge je bil izvedeti več o vlogi jezika na internetu,o vplivu interneta na jezik, ter o razlikah med jezikom uporabljenim v sinhronih in asinhronih klepetalnicah. V ta namen sem analizirala dve sinhroni klepetalnici (kjer komunikacija poteka v realnem času) in dve asinhroni klepetalnici (kjer komunikacija poteka s časovnim zamikom). Napravila sem primerjavo uporabe internetnega slenga v vseh štirih klepetalnicah. Internetni sleng je bil sicer prisoten v obeh vrstah računalniško podprte komunikacije, vendar ne v enakem obsegu. Pogosteje je bil uporabljen v sinhronih klepetalnicah. Sporočila so bila neformalna, slovnica je bila slaba, ločila so bila redkeje uporabljena in tudi krajšanja, ki so tako značilna za internetni sleng, so bila pogosteje uporabljena. Jezik je bil podoben tako govorjenemu kot pisnemu jeziku. Jezik v asinhronih klepetalnicah, pa je bil bolj formalen in podoben knjižnemu jeziku. Možna razloga za razlike med sinhronimi in asinhronimi klepetalnicami sta: (1) Dolžina sporočil. Sporočila v asinhronih klepetalnicah so bila daljša in zato, da bi preprečili nejasnost oz. dvoumnost, so klepetalci uporabljali več ločil, pravilnejšo slovnico in na ustreznih mestih velike začetnice. (2) Čas v katerem je komunikacija potekala. Uporabniki sinhronih klepetalnic si izmenjavajo sporočila v realnem času, kar pomeni, da morajo, zato da ne prekinejo tok pogovora, biti pri pisanju sporočil hitrejši od uporabnikov asinhronih klepetalnic. Ravno zaradi tega, naredijo veliko več slovničnih napak, pišejo krajša sporočila ter uporabljajo več krajšanj.
Keywords:internetni sleng, internet, računalniško podprto komuniciranje, vpliv interneta na jezik, sinhrone in asinhrone klepetalnice
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[T. Burič]
Year of publishing:2011
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-17510 New window
UDC:811.111(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:18226952 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:Y1V5PBRH
Publication date in DKUM:23.03.2011
Views:4469
Downloads:353
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Internetni sleng
Abstract:In recent years, the Internet has taken over our lives by rapidly replacing conventional forms of correspondence, and the Web has become the first port of call for both information enquiry and leisure activity. Most linguists think that the Internet is going to have negative effect on the future of language. They are afraid that Netspeak will rule, language standards will be lost, and creativity diminished as globalization imposes sameness. Some of these predictions have already been realized because there are many examples of Netspeak sneaking into formal writing. On the other hand, there are linguists such as David Crystal, who think just the opposite. He sees Netspeak as a possibility for language innovations and new ways of expressiveness. Netspeak combines writing and speaking to a degree that we have never seen before. Sending messages via instant messaging and in Chat rooms demands speed, and recently, email demands and encourages a similar focus on speed. This speed attempts to capture the essence of spoken communication, but because the keyboard is the means of language generation, users must use their writing skills to make this happen. The result is the use of writing to simulate speech, a skill that we do not formally learn in school or any other educational institution. This skill is developing on its own, through practice only, and its success is remarkable. To simulate spoken communication, Internet users usually turn to a set of nonlinguistic signs called smileys, as well as linguistic play in the form of acronyms and abbreviations. Smileys simulate speech and in fact, some of the bodily communication that accompanies speech by providing physical expressions (mostly facial) that would be apparent in a spoken conversation. The acronyms and abbreviations have two functions: they allow for greater speed, and they let users demonstrate their belonging to the communities that use specific abbreviations. Netspeak is, therefore, a blend of speech and writing, and in its new and adapted techniques of creating meaning specifically for this medium, Internet communication is a highly creative and unique form of language. Internet users are practically speaking with their fingers. The purpose of my paper was to determine the differences between language used in synchronous and language used in asynchronous chatgroups, and how the Internet affects the English language. In order to do that I carried out a study about synchronous chatgroups, where communication takes place in real time, and asynchronous chatgroups, where communication is postponed. I compared the use of Netspeak in two synchronous and two asynchronous chatgroups. Netspeak was present in both modes of computer-mediated communication, but not to the same extent. It was more frequently used in synchronous chatgroups; messages there were informal, grammar and punctuation were poor and shortening, typical for Netspeak, was used more frequently. Language used there really looked like an aggregate of spoken and written language; meanwhile, language used in asynchronous chatgroups was more formal, similar to traditional written language. The following facts could be the possible reasons for the differences between synchronous and asynchronous chatgroups: (1) The length of the messages. Messages in asynchronous chatgroups are longer and in order of not causing ambiguity, chatters have to use more punctuation marks, capital letters and consequently better grammar. (2) The time in which communication takes place. Exchanges in synchronous chatgroups take place in real time, meaning that chatters have to compose their messages as fast as possible, in order of not interrupting the flow of interaction. For that reason, they make more mistakes, use more shortening and write shorter messages than chatters in asynchronous chatgroups.
Keywords:Netspeak, the Internet, computer-mediated communication, the influence of Internet on language, synchronous and asynchronous chatgroups


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica