IZBIRA NAJUSTREZNEJŠE RAZLIČICE POTEKA HITRE CESTE MED AVTOCESTAMA A1 IN A2

Kovačec, Aleš

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	IZBIRA NAJUSTREZNEJŠE RAZLIČICE POTEKA HITRE CESTE MED AVTOCESTAMA A1 IN A2
Authors:	ID Kovačec, Aleš (Author) ID Čančer, Vesna (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UNI_Kovacec_Ales_2012.pdf (2,78 MB) MD5: D57679F64888953271DE7DFE15107100 PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/8c53a031-75cb-403d-aae9-59b9bc332e1b
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Undergraduate thesis
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
Abstract:	Transport je premikanje dobrin in ljudi z enega prostora na drugega. Vlaganje v razvoj infrastrukture je eden izmed bistvenih pogojev gospodarskega razvoja države. Cestna infrastruktura tvori mrežo, tako znotraj države kot tudi s sosednjimi in tudi bolj oddaljenimi državami, zato je dobro, da je vsak njen del smiselno uvrščen v celoto. Iz teh razlogov je potrebno biti izredno previden pri izbiri različice poteka nove ceste, saj je potrebno doseči maksimalno korist ob čim nižjih stroških, čim nižji okoljski škodi in čim višjimi pozitivnimi demografskimi učinki. Vplivi investicije v novo cestno infrastrukturo na gospodarski razvoj posamezne regije in širše so zelo raznoliki. Ločimo pozitivne in negativne vplive. Kot pozitivni se običajno omenjajo, da so avtoceste pospeševalci gospodarskih tokov in tokov prebivalstva, s čimer pomagamo preprečiti demografsko odmiranje oddaljenih območij. Negativni vpliv predstavlja izguba konkurenčnosti zaledja, saj se resursi in tržišča koncentrirajo bližje novi cesti. Na podlagi resničnih podatkov smo naredili analizo problema odločanja - izbire najustreznejše različice poteka hitre ceste med prometno zelo obremenjenima odsekoma avtocest v Sloveniji, to sta avtocesta Ljubljana – Maribor in Ljubljana – Zagreb. Trenutne cestne povezave so namreč neprimerne. Odločili smo se za uporabo metode večkriterijskega odločanja, to je metodo analitičnega hierarhičnega procesa. Uporabili smo program Expert Choice. Pri odločanju o več kriterijih hkrati smo sledili načelom trajnostnega razvoja, zato smo kot kriterije uporabili ekonomski, prostorski in okoljski vidik. Izbirali smo med šestimi alternativami. Pri analizi smo sledili korakom, od strukturiranja odločitvenega drevesa, določitve uteži za kriterije in preferenc do alternativ, do sinteze, s katero smo dobili končne vrednosti. Najustreznejši potek hitre ceste predstavlja različica, ki hkrati povezuje regionalni središči Celje in Novo mesto.
Keywords:	transport, hitra cesta, investicija, učinki na gospodarski razvoj, spillover učinki, večkriterijsko odločanje, analitični hierarhični proces, AHP, Expert Choice, alternative, kriteriji, izbira
Place of publishing:	Ptuj
Publisher:	[A. Kovačec]
Year of publishing:	2012
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-37641
UDC:	519.8
COBISS.SI-ID:	11250716
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:IANI1BQE
Publication date in DKUM:	10.12.2012
Views:	2295
Downloads:	208
Metadata:
Categories:	EPF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	CHOICE OF THE MOST SUITABLE ROAD CORRIDOR BETWEEN MOTORWAYS A1 AND A2
Abstract:	Transportation is the movement of goods and persons from place to place. Investing in the infrastructure development is one of the prerequisites for the economic development of the area. Road infrastructure forms a network, both within the country as well as neighbouring and more distant countries, so it is essential that it fits well within the network. For these reasons you have to be extremely careful when choosing an appropriate road corridor, as it is necessary to achieve maximum benefit at the lowest cost, lowest possible environmental damage and the highest possible positive demographic effects. Effects of investments in new road infrastructure on economic development of each region and beyond are very diverse. We distinguish between positive and negative effects. Positive are effects that increase economic and population flows within region to help prevent demographic dying in hinterlands. An example of negative impacts is the loss of competitiveness of the hinterland, as the resources and markets are located closer to the new road. Based on actual data, we made an analysis of the decision-making problem - the choice of the most suitable road corridor between congested Slovenian motorways A1 between Ljubljana and Maribor and A2 between Ljubljana and Zagreb. The current road network is in bad shape and does not help in stimulating local economy. We used the multi-criteria decision making method – the Analytic Hierarchy Process to choose the most suitable new corridor, supported by computer program Expert Choice. When using the multi-criteria decision making, we follow the principle of sustainable development. That's why we used the Triple Bottom Line Approach where economic, social and environmental perspectives met. Our decision was made on six alternatives. In our analysis we followed steps, from structuring decision tree, determining the weights of criteria and preferences to alternatives, to synthesis, which resulted in an aggregate value of alternatives. The most suitable road corridor is a variant that connects regional centers Celje and Novo mesto.
Keywords:	transport, road corridor, investment, effects on economic development, spillover effects, multi-criteria decision making, analytical hierarchy process, AHP, Expert Choice, alternatives, criteria, choice

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back