| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:ISKANJE RESNICE V KAZENSKEM POSTOPKU
Authors:ID Tkalec, Peter (Author)
ID Dežman, Zlatan (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Tkalec_Peter_2013.pdf (641,69 KB)
MD5: 00A8C85A741B6D4A34354E8F72039E33
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/0cfba5fd-1025-434b-a65c-f848429c588a
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:S pojmom resnice se ukvarja predvsem filozofija, sposojajo pa si ga tudi druge znanosti in stroke. Tako je pojem resnice najprej filozofska kategorija, šele nato moralno-etična, psihološka, pravna … V filozofiji se je oblikovalo več skupin teorij resnic, najbolj znane so korespondenčne, varčne in epistemske teorije resnice. Za pravo, predvsem civilno, je značilna konsenzualna teorija resnice, za kazensko pa, tako trdi večina avtorjev, korespondenčna. Korespondenčna teorija resnice ima za resničen tisti stavek, ki je skladen z realnostjo. Vendar je v kazenskem procesnem pravu preveč zavestnih odstopanj od realne slike, zato je primerneje govoriti, da v kazenskem procesnem pravu velja ena od epistemskih teorij resnice, in sicer konstruktivistična. Slednja še vedno priznava veljavo korespondenčni, a hkrati opozarja tudi na aktivno udeležbo človeka pri oblikovanju končne resnice. Največje ovire pri iskanju resnice v kazenskem postopku predstavljajo dokazne prepovedi, ki ščitijo predvsem človekove pravice, poleg teh pa poznamo še nekatere druge ovire, ki ne izhajajo nujno iz zakona, temveč so človeške narave.
Keywords:resnica, kazenski postopek, dokazne prepovedi, procesne pravice, konstruktivizem, obdolženec, pravno sredstvo
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[P. Tkalec]
Year of publishing:2013
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-39986 New window
UDC:343.15(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:4521003 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:10LSMSMX
Publication date in DKUM:15.04.2013
Views:3395
Downloads:679
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:FINDING THE TRUTH IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Abstract:The term truth is generally studied by philosophy, but the term is also used by other sciences and professions. This means that truth is philosphical term first, in second place is moral-ethical, psychological, juridical etc. There is more groups of theories of truth formed in philosopy. The most known are correspondence theories, minimalist theories and epistemic theories. The consensus theory is typical for the purpose of law, especially for the civil law. On the other hand, correspondence theory, argued by the majority of lecturers, is accepted in criminal law. Correspondence theory argues that a true statement is the one that is in accordance with reality. But in criminal processual law there is too many wilful deviations from reality. That is why one of the epistemic theories, so called constructivist theory, is proper for the purpose of criminal processual law. Constructivist theory still acknowledges correspondence theory but also points at our active participation in forming the final truth. The greatest impediments at truth finding in criminal procedure are evidentiary prohibitions, which shields human rights mostly. There are also some other obstacles, not originating in law on criminal procedure, which are of human nature.
Keywords:truth, criminal procedure, evidentiary prohibitions, processual rights, constructivism, defendant, remedy


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica