| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:PRAVICA JAVNOSTI DO OBVEŠČENOSTI VS. PRAVICA DO ZASEBNOSTI - ANALIZA PRIMERA
Authors:ID Senekovič, Veronika (Author)
ID Knez, Rajko (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Senekovic_Veronika_2013.pdf (1,13 MB)
MD5: B89ABB06C5378E979B8CC9F4C7E1E7E5
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FERI - Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Abstract:Cilj diplomske naloge je raziskati dve vprašanji s področja medijskega prava. Osredotočila sem se na dve pogosto nasprotujoči si pravici, pravico do obveščenosti in pravico do zasebnosti. V ospredju je pravica do svobode izražanja, ustavna pravica, brez katere si težko predstavljamo demokratično družbo. Skozi odmeven in sporen primer o domnevnem očetovstvu visokega cerkvenega dostojanstvenika - Franceta Rodeta, analiziram kdaj so si lahko pravice navzkrižne in kdaj prihaja do kršenja teh. Analiza zajema etični test ali SAD FORMULO, s pomočjo katere rešujemo hipotetična ali realna etična vprašanja, s katerimi se srečujejo novinarji in uredniki ob pisanju prispevkov. Ne glede, kdo odloča o moralni sodbi, je to redko enostavno, saj vedno obstaja dvom v pravilnost odločitve. V nadaljevanju sem uporabila tudi metodo ankete in aplikacijo mnenja javnosti. Kardinal Rode je zoper novinarja in časnik sprožil kazenski in civilnopravni (odškodninski) postopek.
Keywords:pravica javnosti do obveščenosti, pravica do zasebnosti, novinarski kodeks, varstvo časti in dobrega imena, varstvo osebne integritete, kardinal Rode.
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[V. Senekovič]
Year of publishing:2013
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-42145 New window
UDC:[342.732+343.45]:316.77(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:17413398 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:G0E4Y6DT
Publication date in DKUM:23.09.2013
Views:4752
Downloads:626
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:KTFMB - FERI
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO BE INFORMED VS. THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY - CASE ANALYSIS
Abstract:The goal of this paper is researching the area of media law. It is going to focus on two conflicting aspects. On one hand, there is people's right to be informed and on the other, the right to individual privacy. Furthermore, there is also the constitutional right of freedom of speech, base for democratic society we live in. With analysis of the controversial and popular case of alleged fatherhood of Father Bishop Franc Rode, it will try to demonstrate, when those rights can be contradicting and when they are being violated. Situation, Analysis, Decision (SAD) method for making ethical decision is useful tool for approaching real or hypothetical ethical questions for reaching a defensible ethical decision in journalism. No matter who is responsible for moral judgment, it is rarely simple and there is always a doubt in accuracy of the decision. Father Bishop Franc Rode filed a lawsuit against the reporter and the media house.
Keywords:the public’s right to be informed, the right to privacy, press code, protection of honour and good name, protection of personal integrity, Cardinal Rode.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica