Primerjava metod poučevanja pri konsekutivnem tolmačenju angleščine in nemščine na podlagi tehnik zapisovanja

Šumak, Nataša

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Primerjava metod poučevanja pri konsekutivnem tolmačenju angleščine in nemščine na podlagi tehnik zapisovanja
Authors:	ID Šumak, Nataša (Author) ID Teržan Kopecky, Karmen (Mentor) More about this mentor... ID Zupan, Simon (Comentor)
Files:	UNI_Sumak_Natasa_2014.pdf (2,76 MB) MD5: 3FE573F79024648E81EE343451059C9D
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Undergraduate thesis
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:	Pričujoče diplomsko delo povzema zgodovino ter razvoj tolmačenja in predstavi vrste tolmačenja s poudarkom na konsekutivnem tolmačenju. Izpostavi vlogo spomina pri procesu tolmačenja in osvetli različne tehnike zapisovanja pri konsekutivnem tolmačenju. V osrednjem delu je predstavljena podrobna analiza raziskave osmih sodelujočih tolmačev, primerjava napak pri tolmačenjih in tehnik zapisovanja med dvema programoma – Prevajanje in tolmačenje -angleščina in -nemščina ter končne ugotovitve oziroma problematika, ki smo jo izsledili pri študentih. Naša hipoteza je bila, da si zapiski glede na smer programa med seboj ne bodo podobni, kajti sodelujoči študenti so bili deležni različnih šol tehnik zapisovanja. Namen diplomskega dela je bil analizirati in primerjati različne metode tehnik zapisovanja pri predmetu Konsekutivno tolmačenje in ugotoviti, ali različnost uporabljenih metod na kakršenkoli način vpliva na kakovost tolmačenja. Za potrebe raziskave smo izbrali krajši članek, ki so ga študenti konsekutivno stolmačili iz tujega v materni jezik. Snemanje smo izvedli v fonolaboratoriju Filozofske fakultete UM. Naša raziskava je pokazala, da se študenti poslužujejo različnih metod zapisovanja. Študenti so dokazali, da je »prost pristop« tj. da si vsak tolmač izdela sebi najlažji in najučinkovitejši sistem zapisovanja v praksi uspešen. Torej ni pravilnih ali napačnih načinov, kako zapisovati pri konsekutivnem tolmačenju. Vsak tolmač razvije lasten sistem zapisovanja, ki ga z leti izboljšuje. Rezultati raziskave so potrdili, da različni pristopi tehnik zapisovanja ne vplivajo na kakovost tolmačenja.
Keywords:	tolmačenje, konsekutivno tolmačenje, spomin, tehnike zapisovanja pri konsekutivnem tolmačenju
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[N. Šumak]
Year of publishing:	2014
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-44242
UDC:	81'253(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	20607752
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:TKEEM4MP
Publication date in DKUM:	17.06.2014
Views:	1625
Downloads:	177
Metadata:
Categories:	FF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	A Comparison of Teaching Methods for Consecutive Interpretation in English and German on the Basis of Note-taking Techniques
Abstract:	The thesis summarizes the history and development of interpretation and presents modes of interpreting with a focus on consecutive interpreting. It highlights the role of memory in the process of interpretation and note-taking in consecutive interpreting. The central part comprises a detailed analysis of eight students, a comparison of errors and note-taking between the two programs - Translation and interpretation –English and -German as well as final conclusions and issues that were observed in the students. Our hypothesis was that notes between English and German students would differ, because participating students were taught different note-taking techniques. The aim of our research was to analyze and compare these different methods and establish whether different approaches to teaching note-taking technique for consecutive interpreting had an effect on the quality of interpretation. For the purpose of our study, a short article was selected that students had to interpret consecutively from foreign language into their mother tongue. Our research took place in the language laboratory at the Faculty of Arts, University of Maribor. Our study showed that students used different note-taking techniques. Students demonstrated that the “it-is-up-to-every-individual” approach, ie. that each interpreter develops his or her own most efficient technique, is successful in practice. So there are no correct or incorrect approaches to note-taking. Interpreters develop individual techniques that improve over time. The results of our research confirmed that different approaches to note-taking for consecutive interpreters do not have an effect on the quality of interpretation.
Keywords:	Interpretation, consecutive interpreting, memory, note-taking for consecutive interpreting

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back