| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Zahtevki zoper izvajalca, projektanta in nadzornega inženirja zaradi napak gradbe
Authors:ID Ravbar, Ivan (Author)
ID Kranjc, Vesna (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Ravbar_Ivan_2016.pdf (522,78 KB)
MD5: 3CD96DAD8FB6CFD7DE081B2EE69D405E
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:V nalogi so obravnavani zahtevki zoper izvajalca, projektanta in nadzornega inženirja zaradi napak gradbe. Ker gre za zahtevke, ki temeljijo na različnih pravnih podlagah, naloga posveča pozornost tako pravnemu temelju odgovornosti posameznega udeleženca, kot tudi pravni naravi zahtevka zoper vsakega izmed njih. V okviru ločenih vsebinskih sklopov po posameznih udeležencih so tako sistematično prikazani pravna narava odgovornosti posameznega udeleženca, predpostavke za njeno uveljavitev in zahtevki naročnika. Ker prihaja v teoriji do določenih odstopanj pri pravni kvalifikaciji zahtevkov za povrnitev nadaljnje škode, ki nastane naročniku poleg napake gradbe, se naloga ukvarja tudi s temi pojavnimi oblikami škod, njihovo pravno naravo in predpostavkami za njihovo povrnitev. Posebna pozornost se skozi celotno nalogo namenja vsem tistim vprašanjem, ki so se v dosedanji teoriji (in praksi) pokazala kot sporna in se nanje poskušajo dati jasni odgovori. Kjer do odgovorov na odprta vprašanja ni mogoče priti z neposredno uporabo ustreznih zakonskih določb, naloga išče rešitve v smiselni uporabi institutov, ki so primerljivi z instituti, ki jih obravnava naloga. Če zakonske rešitve ne ustrezajo več razvoju in potrebam prakse, naloga na to posebej opozarja. Teoretične rešitve se v nalogi primerjajo z rešitvami iz sodne prakse, pri posameznih institutih se vlečejo vzporednice z rešitvami iz tuje pravne teorije. Cilj naloge je potrditi raziskovalno tezo, da je navkljub različnim pravnim podlagam glede odgovornosti izvajalca, projektanta in nadzornega inženirja za napako gradbe, zoper vsakega izmed njih mogoče uveljavljati enak zahtevek - zahtevek na odpravo napake same.
Keywords:zahtevki zoper izvajalca zaradi napak gradbe, zahtevki zoper projektanta zaradi napak gradbe, zahtevki zoper nadzornega inženirja zaradi napak gradbe
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[I. Ravbar]
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-60285 New window
UDC:347.4/.5:69(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:5182251 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:AQWGNKOM
Publication date in DKUM:15.09.2016
Views:1693
Downloads:113
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Construction defect claims brought against contractors, designers and site supervisors
Abstract:The thesis discusses construction defect claims brought against contractors, designers and site supervisors. As claims of this kind are based on different legal bases, the thesis pays attention to both the legal basis of liability of a specific party and the legal nature of the claim brought against either of the aforementioned parties. Separate parts of the thesis thus systematically, by party, illustrate the legal nature of liability of a specific party, pre-requisites for their enforcement and claims brought by clients. As theory is marked by certain derogations with regard to the legal qualification of claims for further damages incurred by clients in addition to construction defects, the thesis also deals with these manifestations of damage, their legal nature and compensation pre-requisites. Throughout the entire text, special emphasis is placed on issues that have so far proven controversial in theory (and practice) and that the author of this thesis has sought to provide clear answers for. Where the direct applicability of relevant legal provisions has failed to provide answers to outstanding issues, the thesis has sought to provide appropriate solutions through a mutatis mutandis application of legal constructs comparable to legal constructs discussed in the thesis. The author also highlights legal solutions that are no longer applicable to practical developments and needs. Theoretical solutions are compared to case-law solutions. Legal construct-specific parallels to solutions from foreign legal theory are also provided. The objective of the thesis is to confirm the hypothesis that, different legal bases related to the construction defect liability of contractors, designers or site supervisors notwithstanding, the same claim can be brought against each of these parties – a construction defect remedy claim.
Keywords:construction defect claims brought against contractors, construction defect claims brought against designers, construction defect claims brought against supervisors


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica