| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:The employee as the unknown actor? : a discourse analysis of the employee share ownership debate with special emphasis on the Central and Eastern Europe
Authors:ID Kranz, Olaf (Author)
ID Steger, Thomas (Author)
ID Hartz, Ronald (Author)
Files:.pdf Organizacija_2016_Kranz,_Steger,_Hartz_The_Employee_as_the_Unknown_Actor_A_Discourse_Analysis_of_the_Employee_Share_Ownership_Debate_wit.pdf (657,20 KB)
MD5: 4ADB5957F2B944E31003A6B9439F7F12
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/88fa018b-b134-460b-a189-ff6c1b2dfecf
 
URL https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/orga.2016.49.issue-2/orga-2016-0006/orga-2016-0006.xml
 
Language:English
Work type:Scientific work
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FOV - Faculty of Organizational Sciences in Kranj
Abstract:Background and purpose: Although employee share ownership (ESO) deserves of a long tradition, we still know little about employees’ perspectives about ESO. The lack of knowledge about the employees’ attitudes towards ESO is discursively filled in the ESO debate. This paper challenges that deficit by carrying out a semantic analysis of the literature with the aim to identify the various actor constructions used implicitly in the ESO discourse. Design/Methodology/Approach: We conduct a semantic analysis of the ESO discourse. To unfold the order of this discourse we draw on the distinction between surface and underlying structure of communication in the sense of Michel Foucault. We interpret some semantic lead differences, a term coined by Niklas Luhmann, to constitute the underlying structure of communication. Results: We can identify six different streams on the ESO discourse’s surface level each defined by the ends pursued. The discourse’s underlying structure is made up of the distinctions production-consumption, capital-labour, and ownership-control that also determine the actor models implicitly in use. Conclusion: We can identify five different actor models implicit in the ESO discourse. While the CEE discourse differs on the surface level in as far as it is more concerned with questions of political legitimation of the privatisation process than with questions of economic efficiency, thus introducing political distinctions in the discourse rather missing in the west, it shares the underlying semantic lead differences with the Western discourse as well as the actor models anchored in those differences.
Keywords:Employee Share Ownership, discourse analysis, semantic lead distinctions, actor constructions, CEE countries
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year of publishing:2016
Number of pages:str. 77-93
Numbering:Letn. 49, št. 2
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-69419 New window
ISSN:1318-5454
UDC:331.107.5:658.114.2
ISSN on article:1318-5454
COBISS.SI-ID:285683968 New window
DOI:10.1515/orga-2016-0006 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:A4U7O0KK
Publication date in DKUM:22.01.2018
Views:1278
Downloads:139
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Organizacija : revija za management, informatiko in kadre
Shortened title:Organizacija
Publisher:Moderna organizacija
ISSN:1318-5454
COBISS.SI-ID:610909 New window

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:22.01.2018

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Zaposleni kot neznani akter? : analiza lastništva zaposlenih s posebnim poudarkom na srednji in vzhodni Evropi
Abstract:Ozadje in namen: Čeprav ima lastništvo zaposlenih dolgoletno tradicijo, še vedno ne vemo veliko o pogledih samih zaposlenih na to obliko lastništva. Pomanjkanje znanja o odnosu zaposlenih do lastništva zaposlenih spodbuja nadaljnjo razpravo. S tem člankom želimo prispevati k temu, da zapolnimo omenjeni primanjkljaj tako, da smo izvedli semantično analizo literature z namenom, da prepoznamo različne strukture akterjev, ki se posredno pojavljajo v tem diskurzu. Zasnova / metodologija / pristop: Izvedli smo semantično analizo diskurza o lastništvu zaposlenih. Z namenom sistematične analize smo potegnili ločnico med površinsko in poglobljeno strukturo komunikacije v smislu Michela Foucaulta. Interpretiramo nekatere vodilne semantične razlike - izraz, ki ga skoval Niklas Luhmann - da bi predstavili osnovno strukturo komunikacije. Rezultati: Lahko identificiramo šest različnih tokov na površju diskurza o lastništvu zaposlenih; vsak od njih je opredeljen z nameni, ki jim sledi. Temeljno strukturo diskurza tvori razlikovanje med proizvodnjo-potrošnjo, kapitalom-delom in lastništvom-nadzorom, kar tudi določa katere modele akterji implicitno uporabljajo. Zaključek: Implicitno lahko v diskurzu identificiramo pet različnih modelov akterjev. Diskurz v državah srednje in vhodne Evrope se razlikuje na površinski ravni, saj je bolj usmerjen v vprašanja politične legitimacije procesa privatizacije kot v vprašanja ekonomske učinkovitosti, s čimer uvaja politično razlikovanje v diskurz, kar se običajno ne kaže na zahodu. Skupna pa je semantična interpretacija razlik kot tudi modeli akterjev, ki izhajajo iz v teh razlik.
Keywords:podjetja, zaposleni, lastniki, kolektivna lastnina, kapitalska razmerja


Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. Organizacija

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica