| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Različna forenzična mnenja - razlogi in posledice : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa Varstvoslovje
Authors:ID Berčič, Nika (Author)
ID Maver, Darko (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Bercic_Nika_2018.pdf (925,80 KB)
MD5: 1006DAA7109B43A48486044087268646
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/f85ffd47-8dc6-48df-a625-56d80ca5c6ab
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Forenzična mnenja se nemalokrat razlikujejo med seboj. Gotovo bi lahko celo rekli, da kolikor je izvedencev, toliko je različnih mnenj. Te razlike so lahko takšne z malo odstopanja ali pa popolnoma nasprotujočih in kontradiktornih, divergentnih mnenj. Na takšne težave niso imuna nobena izvedenska mnenja, saj se razlike med njimi pojavljajo, če gre za strokovnjake, zaposlene v isti službi, zaposlene v isti državi ali pa neznancev, zaposlenih v različnih državah. Razlike med mnenji so verjetno pogostejše in jih je bolj logično pričakovati, če zadevo v pregled pošljemo izvedencem v različne države. Pa vendar si nasprotujejo tudi mnenja strokovnjakov iste stroke v isti državi, kar se zdravemu razumu z veliko verjetnostjo ne zdi najbolj logično. Toda kaj povzroča razlike v mnenjih? Ali gre za razlike pri izobraževanju in usposabljanju »forenzikov«? Ali so razlog različne metode preiskovanja sledi? Morda so krivi različni sistemi prepričanj, ki veljajo v določeni državi ali na določenem območju? Ali gre za vpliv pristranskosti zaradi primerov, ki so jih v svoji karieri »forenziki« že obravnavali? Ima pri tem morda vmes prste intuicija? Morda osebnost, personalna prepričanja in vrednote ključno prispevanju h končni odločitvi za podano mnenje? Naša naloga je ugotoviti, zakaj do razlik v izvedenskih mnenjih sploh prihaja ter kakšne so njihove posledice. Prizadevali si bomo odkriti, kje obstajajo tiste ključne pomanjkljivosti, ki prispevajo k tem razlikam.
Keywords:forenzika, forenzični strokovnjaki, izvedenska mnenja, ENFSI smernice, standardi, diplomske naloge
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[N. Berčič]
Year of publishing:2018
Year of performance:2018
Number of pages:IV, 59 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-70306 New window
UDC:343.983(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:3561450 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:DHJCTNNE
Publication date in DKUM:20.06.2018
Views:1371
Downloads:115
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Divergemt forensic opinions - causes and consequences
Abstract:Forensic opinions often differ from one another. We might even say that there are as many forensic opinions as there are forensic experts. The differences in forensic opinions can be with the smallest degree of deviation or completely contradictory. No forensic expert opinion is immune to such problems, as there are always differences, it does not matter if it is about experts, employed in same building/same country or about experts, who do not now each other, because they come from different countries. Differences between opinions are more likely, more frequent and more logical to be expected between experts of different countries. However, there are differences between experts' opinions who live in the same country as well. But what causes differences in opinions? Are there significant differences in education and training for forensic experts? Are there different methods of tracking evidences? Are there different systems of beliefs that apply to the particular country or region? Are there impacts of biases because of the cases that forensic experts have already dealt with in their careers? Has intuition something to do with it? Perhaps personality, personal beliefs and values are the key contributors to the final decision? Our task is to find out why there are differences in expert opinions and what are their consequences. We will seek to find out where those key deficiencies are, that contribute to these differences.
Keywords:forensic expert, forensic opinion, ENFSI guidelines, cognitive biases


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica