| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Vpliv parametrov aplikacije na oblikovanje depozita škropilne brozge na listih čebule
Authors:ID Sirk, Marijan (Author)
ID Lešnik, Mario (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Sirk_Marijan_2019.pdf (1,64 MB)
MD5: 47F450A799F530CA0D8824680453DB07
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/47d2a976-d85a-4518-9339-5f4e846041d6
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:FKBV - Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Abstract:Aplikacijska tehnika ima velik vpliv na učinkovitost delovanja fitofarmacevtskih sredstev (FFS) za zatiranje škodljivih organizmov na čebuli. Na tem področju nimamo veliko informacij, še posebej glede vpliva tehnike na zmanjševanje zanašanja FFS. Izvedli smo poljski poskus, v katerem smo preučevali vpliv parametrov aplikacije in dodajanja močila Break Thru® (kopolimer tri-siloksana) na oblikovanje depozita škropilne brozge na površju listov čebule. Značilnosti depozita smo prikazali z uporabo testnih lističev, občutljivih za vodo (angl. WSP), in z meritvami koncentracije barvila tartrazin (E102), izluženega iz filtrirnega papirja ter s površja listov čebule. Aplikacijo škropilne brozge smo izvedli s standardno poljedelsko škropilnico, umerjeno na porabo vode 200 ali 400 l/ha. Testirali smo šobe TeeJet® XR 11002, 11004; TeeJet® Twin 60 11002, 60 11004 in TeeJet® Turbo Twin 60 11002 ali 60 11004. Statistična analiza je pokazala značilne razlike med depoziti barvila tartrazin, ki so jih različne šobe oblikovale na različnih delih zelenja čebule. Šoba TeeJet® Twin je deponirala značilno več barvila na listju čebule kot drugi dve testirani šobi. Povečanje porabe vode iz 200 l/ha na 400 l/ha ni značilno povečalo depozita barvila. Učinek dodajanja močila Break-Thru je bil pri različnih šobah različen in je povzročil povečanje depozita na različnih delih listov čebule.
Keywords:čebula, škropivo, škropljenje, šobe, močilo
Place of publishing:Maribor
Year of publishing:2019
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-73337 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:LPUEIJ6A
Publication date in DKUM:17.04.2019
Views:1087
Downloads:104
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FKBV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:27.03.2019

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The effects of spray application parameters on spray deposit formation on onion leaves
Abstract:The application technique has a great influence on the effectiveness of the plant protection products (PPP) for the control of harmful organisms of onion. In this area, we have a large deficit of information, especially with regard to the impact of the technique for reducing the drift of PPPs. A field trial was carried out to test the effects of spray application parameters and the effects of adding Break Thru®, a trisiloksane based adjuvant, on the formation and retention of spray deposits on onion leaf surfaces. The characteristics of spray deposits were shown by using water sensitive papers (WSP) and by measuring the concentration of the tartrazine dye (E102) extracted from onion leaves. The spray application was carried out using a standard field boom sprayer set to deliver 200 or 400 l of spray per hectare. The nozzles TeeJet® XR 11002, 11004, TeeJet® Twin 60 11002, 60 11004 and TeeJet® Turbo Twin 60 11002 or 60 11004 were tested. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between nozzles in terms of the tartratzine deposit at different positions on the onion canopy. The TeeJet® Twin nozzle deposited significantly more tartratzine compared to the other two tested nozzles. The increase of spray volume from 200 to 400 l/ha did not increase the tartrazine deposit significantly. The effect of adding the adjuvant was different with each of the tested nozzles. It caused an increase of tartrazine deposits at different positions on the onion leaves.
Keywords:onion, spray, application, nozzles, adjuvant


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica