| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Razlike v biodiverziteti vinograda za ekološko in KOPOP pridelavo : diplomsko delo
Authors:ID Pinterič, Žiga (Author)
ID Urbanek Krajnc, Andreja (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Podvršnik, Miran (Comentor)
Files:.pdf UN_Pinteric_Ziga_2022.pdf (3,02 MB)
MD5: B8DC584B6DBE5C02237DA8B85544D02C
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FKBV - Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Abstract:Kmetijstvo daje vse večji poudarek naravi prijaznem kmetovanju tudi v vinogradniški panogi. Z novimi prepovedmi in dodatnim omejevanjem uporabe fitofarmacevtskih sredstev se vse več kmetijskih gospodarstev odloča za ekološko kmetovanje. Namen diplomske naloge je bil popisati delež rastlin v medvrstnem pasu vinograda in ovrednotiti razlike v biodiverziteti za ekološki in KOPOP vinograd s pomočjo Shannonovega indeksa rastlinske pestrosti in CSR trikotnika po Grimu. V KOPOP pridelavi smo ugotovili povečanje deleža metuljnic, medtem ko je bil delež zeli nižji v primerjavi z ekološkim. Popisali smo 49 različnih vrst, med katerimi so se nekatere pojavljale samo v ekološkem ali samo v KOPOP načinu pridelave. Vrstna pestrost je bila večja pri KOPOP načinu pridelave, vendar smo večji Shannonov indeks določili v ekološkem načinu pridelave. Nadalje smo v ekološki pridelavi popisali signifikantni višji delež vrst rdeča bilnica (Festuca rubra), plazeči petoprstnik (Potentilla reptans) in njivski osat (Cirsium arvense), medtem ko je bil delež navadnega rmana (Achillea millefolium) nižji v primerjavi s KOPOP. Na podlagi vrednotenja CSR strategij smo dokazali, da se v KOPOP pridelavi pojavlja večji delež ruderalnih in stres tolerantnih vrst. Zaključimo lahko, da je biodiverziteta travne ruše v ekološkem vinogradu večja in bolj uravnotežena, saj kaže večjo tolerantnost na stres in prilagojenost na antropogene motnje.
Keywords:biodiverziteta, oskrba tal, trajna ozelenitev, Shannonov indeks, CSR strategije
Place of publishing:Maribor
Place of performance:Maribor
Publisher:[Ž. Pinterič]
Year of publishing:2022
Number of pages:VIII, 29 str., [1] f. pril.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-83002 New window
UDC:634.8:574.1(043.2)=163.6
COBISS.SI-ID:123059715 New window
Publication date in DKUM:27.09.2022
Views:946
Downloads:80
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FKBV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:13.09.2022

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Biodiversity differences in vineyards with organic and KOPOP managment
Abstract:Nowadays agriculture increasingly leans towards organic and environmental friendly farming, which is also the case in winemaking. With new strict policies and prohibitions of phytopharmaceuticals, more and more farms decide on organic farming. The intention of the research was to collect plant shares in inter-rows of organic and KOPOP management vineyards and to calculate the level of biodiversity with the Shannon index and the CSR triangle. The research indicates that the share of Fabaceae is higher in KOPOP management and the share of herbs is higher in organic vineyards. More species were found in KOPOP management, but the Shannon index of biodiversity was higher for the organic ones. Next, the significantly higher shares of species red fescue (Festuca rubra), creeping cinquefoil (Potenttilla reptans) and creeping thistle (Cirsium arvense) were collected, when the share of common yarrow (Achillea millefolium) was lower in comparison with KOPOP management. With the help of the CSR triangle, it was discovered that more ruderals and stress tolerant strategists are present in the KOPOP management, which shows more stress and anthropogenic disturbance. It could be concluded that the organic management has better biodiversity according to the Shannon index and is more in balanced due to less plants being S and R strategists.
Keywords:biodiversity, soil managment, grass cover, Shannon index, CSR strategies


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica