| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Stvarni omejevalni ukrepi : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa Varstvoslovje
Authors:ID Koncilija, Sara (Author)
ID Žaberl, Miroslav (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Koncilija_Sara_2022.pdf (1,21 MB)
MD5: 94E4F698B0E93CE4F46E0CCCF613C6B1
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Omejevalni ukrepi zavzemajo posebno mesto v kazenskem postopku, saj gre za posege v pravice in svoboščine obdolžencev že pred pravnomočno obsodilno sodbo, kar pomeni, da zanje še ni bilo ugotovljeno, če so sploh storili kaznivo dejanje. Ker pravnomočne obsodilne sodbe še ni, obdolženca varuje domneva nedolžnosti, zaradi česar so ti ukrepi lahko precej nevarni. Zavoljo tega mora biti za vsak tak poseg izpolnjen zakonsko določen pogoj, vključno z dokaznim standardom. Omejevalnih ukrepov nikoli ne smemo jemati za samoumevne, kot nujno posledico uvedbe kazenskega postopka po domnevno storjenem kaznivem dejanju. Ravno nasprotno, vselej so izjema in nikoli pravilo. Kljub temu pa ima država pravico, do uporabe prisilnih ukrepov, ki ji omogočajo izvedbo kazenskega postopka. V Sloveniji omejevalne ukrepe ločimo na osebne ali personalne, pri katerih država poseže v osebno svobodo posameznika ter stvarne ali realne, kjer se poseže v posameznikovo premoženje. Ne glede na vrsto, so ti namenjeni za odpravo nevarnosti ter zagotovitev učinkovite izvedbe kazenskega postopka. V diplomski nalogi se osredotočamo na stvarne omejevalne ukrepe, se pravi ukrepe, ki posežejo v premoženje obdolženca ali drugih oseb in se v praksi uporabljajo dokaj pogosto. Mednje spadajo začasni zaseg predmetov, začasno zavarovanje premoženjskopravnega zahtevka in začasno zavarovanje odvzema protipravne premoženjske koristi. Namenjeni pa so zagotoviti oziroma zavarovati uspešno izvedbo kazenskega postopka in izvršitev sodbe na koncu postopka. Stališče kazenskega prava je, da koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem ali zaradi njega, nihče ne sme obdržati. Ravno zato morajo v kazenskem postopku odvzeti vse predmete, ki so bili uporabljeni, namenjeni ali pridobljeni s kaznivim dejanjem.
Keywords:stvarni omejevalni ukrepi, Zakon o kazenskem postopku, začasni zaseg predmetov, začasno zavarovanje premoženjskega zahtevka, začasno zavarovanje odvzema protipravne premoženjske koristi, diplomske naloge
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[S. Koncilija]
Year of publishing:2022
Year of performance:2022
Number of pages:VIII f., 40 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-83373-d0733114-31c1-abe1-c3df-34ba3182eac8 New window
UDC:343.13(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:132849155 New window
Publication date in DKUM:08.12.2022
Views:841
Downloads:82
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:08.11.2022

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Substantive restrictive measures
Abstract:Restrictive measures take up a special place in the criminal proceeding, as they interfere with the rights and freedoms of the defendants even before a final conviction, which means that it has not yet been established if they have committed the criminal act in the first place. There is no final conviction, thus the defendant is protected by the presumption of innocence, which can make these measures quite dangerous. Therefore, any such intervention must comply with a statutory condition, including a standard of proof. Restrictive measures should never be taken for granted as a necessary consequence of the initiation of criminal proceedings after an allegedly committed crime. On the contrary, they are always the exception and never the rule. Nevertheless, the state has the right to use coercive measures that enable it to carry out criminal proceedings. In Slovenia, restrictive measures are divided into personal, where the state interferes with one’s freedom, and substantive, where one's property is interfered with. Regardless of the type, they are intended to eliminate the danger and ensure that the criminal procedure is carried out effectively. In the thesis, we focus on substantive restrictive measures, that is, measures that interfere with the property of the defendant or other persons and are used quite often in practice. These include the temporary seizure of objects, the temporary securing of a property claim, and the temporary securing of the confiscation of unlawful property benefits. They are intended to ensure or guarantee the successful execution of criminal proceedings and the execution of the judgment at the end of the proceedings. The position of criminal law is that no one should keep the benefits obtained by or as a result of a crime. This is precisely why, in criminal proceedings, they must confiscate all items that were used, intended for, or obtained through a criminal act.
Keywords:substantive restrictive measures, Criminal Procedure Act, temporary seizure of objects, the temporary securing of a property claim, the temporary securing of the confiscation of unlawful property benefit


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica