| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:Krležine nepokretne i pokretne slike
Authors:ID Lukács, István (Author)
Files:URL https://press.um.si/index.php/ump/catalog/book/763
 
.pdf RAZ_Lukacs_Istvan_2023.pdf (14,15 MB)
MD5: 88310E385FE90F3309E14642225A7748
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Scientific work
Typology:2.01 - Scientific Monograph
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
UZUM - University of Maribor Press
Abstract:V znanstveni monografiji budimpeškega kroatista in slovenista prof. dr. Istvána Lukácsa Krleževe negibljive in gibljive slike je predvsem iz madžarskega kulturnega in književnega primerjalnega zornega kota predstavljena problematika intertekstualnosti in intermedialnosti v ustvarjalnosti klasika hrvaške književnosti Miroslava Krleže. V prvem delu monografije prek analize konkretnih besedil (pesmi, roman Zastave) predstavlja problematiko recepcije Adyjeve lirike in madžarske slikarske produkcije (Dezső Orbán) na začetku XX. stoletja, v drugem obširnejšem delu pa Krležev odnos do filma. Avtorjeva teza je, da je nov optični medij (film) na začetku XX. stoletja igral pomembno vlogo pri nastajanju njegovih zgodnjih dramskih besedil (Legende). Gre za dela, ki so nastala v pisateljevi zgodnji mladosti, neposredno po vrnitvi iz Budimpešte, kjer se je šolal na vojaški akademiji, zato avtor upravičeno domneva in to v monografiji tudi dokaže, da se je Krleža najverjetneje že takrat seznanil z nemim filmom in madžarskimi teoretičnimi deli o filmu. O Krleževih „tonfilmskih imaginacijah” so pisali že prej, vendar brez natančnejše strokovne elaboracije celotne problematike. Prvi strokovnjak, ki je v svojem obširnem eseju o Krleževih zgodnjih dramskih besedilih omenil možnost aplikacije filmske tehnike pri odrski postavitvi, je bil ravnatelj zagrebške Drame Josip Bach, ki je sicer odklonil uprizoritev vseh Krleževih dram. Bachova lucidna ugotovitev je za avtorja monografije bila pravo izhodišče za analizo Krleževih Legend, vendar ne z vidika možne gledališke inscenacije, ampak morebitne filmske inspiracije tako pri določenih temah (Jezus, Saloma, Krištof Kolumb) kot pri aplikaciji kinopoetike, še zlasti pri netipičnih didaskalijah. Zadnja desetletja avtorji v sodobni literarni teoriji o intermedialnosti pogosto tematizirajo povezave med literarnim besedilom in filmom, analizirajo filmske adaptacije znanih književnih del ter pišejo o filmičnosti, kinostilu in kinopoetiki konkretnih literarnih del. Po avtorjevih ugotovitvah vse te stilne elemente najdemo tudi v Krleževih zgodnjih delih (Legende, simfonije), vendar je „filmski jezik” tako izrazito prisoten, da tudi strukturalno zaznamuje ta dela. Avtor monografije prav zaradi zaznamovalne moči teh elementov Krleževe določene didaskalije in scenske rešitve imenuje kinotekst. Ta literarnoteoretski pojem je inovacija, ki se nanaša na določene dele konkretnega književnega besedila, in je pravzaprav popolnoma adekvaten filmskemu kadru. To pomeni, da so nekateri segmenti v Krleževem literarnem besedilu pravi filmski kader in tako tudi funkcionirajo. Gre za nenavaden paradoks, saj je književnost besedna umetnost, film pa vizualna.
Keywords:Miroslav Krleža, intertekstualnost, intermedialnost, madžarska kultura, film, kinotekst
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Place of publishing:Maribor
Place of performance:Maribor
Publisher:Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
Year of publishing:2023
Year of performance:2023
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-83884 New window
ISBN:978-961-286-711-9
UDC:821.163.42:929Krleža M.(0.034.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:143338499 New window
DOI:10.18690/um.ff.4.2023 New window
Publication date in DKUM:02.03.2023
Views:713
Downloads:128
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:02.03.2023

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Krležaʹs Still and Moving Images
Abstract:In his monograph Krleža’s Still And Moving Images, Prof. Dr. István Lukács, a Croatist and Slovenist living in Budapest presents the problem of intertextuality and intermediality in the work of the classic of Croatian literature, Miroslav Krleža from a comparative Hungarian cultural and literary point of view. In the first part of the monograph, through the analysis of concrete texts (several poems and the novel Flags), the author examines the problem of the reception of Ady's lyric poetry and Hungarian painting production (Dezső Orbán) at the beginning of the 20th century, while in the second, more extensive part, he scrutinizes Krleža's relationship to film. The author's thesis is that the new optical medium (film) played an important role in the formation of Krleža's early dramatic texts (Legends) at the beginning of the 20th century. These works were written in the writer's early youth, immediately after his return from Budapest, where he had studied at the military academy. The author rightly assumes and then proves in his monograph that Krleža was probably already familiar with silent film and Hungarian theoretical works on film at that time. Some authors have already published papers on Krleža's "sound film imaginings", but without a more detailed scholarly elaboration of the whole issue. The first expert to mention the possibility of applying the film technique to a stage production in his extensive essay on Krleža's early plays was Josip Bach, the director of the Drama theater in Zagreb, who refused to stage all of Krleža's plays. Bach's clear observation served as a suitable starting point for the monograph's author to analyse Krleža's Legends, not from the point of view of a possible theatrical staging, but from a possible cinematic inspiration, both in certain themes (Jesus, Salome, Christopher Columbus) as in the application of film poetry, especially in atypical stage directions. In recent decades, authors in contemporary literary theory on intermediality have often thematised the links between literary text and film, they analyse film adaptations of well-known literary works, and write about the filmicity, cinematic style and film poetry of specific literary works. According to the author's findings, all these stylistic elements are also found in Krleža's early works (Legends, symphonies), but the "cinematic language" is so distinctly present that it also structurally characterises these works. The author of the monograph uses the term kinotekst to refer to Krleža's particular stage directions and scenic solutions precisely because of the marking power of these elements. This literary-theoretical notion is an innovation that refers to certain parts of a concrete literary text, and is in fact perfectly adequate to the film cut. This means that certain segments in Krleža's literary text are a real film cut and function as such. It is a strange paradox, since literature is a verbal art and film is a visual art.
Keywords:Miroslav Krleža, intertextuality, intermediality, Hungarian culture, film, kinotekst


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica