Aktualne teoretične in praktične dileme objektivnega pogoja kaznivosti v kazenskem pravu : magistrsko delo

Kos, Staša

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Aktualne teoretične in praktične dileme objektivnega pogoja kaznivosti v kazenskem pravu : magistrsko delo
Authors:	ID Kos, Staša (Author) ID Šepec, Miha (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	MAG_Kos_Stasa_2023.pdf (765,00 KB) MD5: ED65CB4544295D5B78AD77C3472D5478
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Master's thesis/paper
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Objektivni pogoj kaznivosti je v sodobni kazenskopravni teoriji opredeljen kot posebna predpostavka kaznivosti dejanja, ki je zunaj dometa elementov splošnega pojma kaznivega dejanja. Je okoliščina, ki je v neposredni zvezi z dejanjem, vendar ni del neprava, ki ga zajema bit kaznivega dejanja. Objektivni pogoj kaznivosti torej ni del biti kaznivega dejanja v okviru elementov večstopenjskega splošnega pojma kaznivega dejanja, pomeni pa materialno predpostavko kaznivosti, saj kaznivo dejanje nastane šele z njegovo izpolnitvijo. Za objektivni pogoj učbeniki kazenskega prava radi poudarjajo, da je še posebej zunaj koncepta krivde ter ne zahteva in ne prenese krivdnega odnosa storilca. Obstajajo pa nekateri kazenskopravni teoretiki, ki se s svojimi stališči skušajo izogniti očitkom nasprotovanja objektivnega pogoja kaznivosti načelu krivdne odgovornosti, pri čemer pa se zgodi, da zapadejo v notranja protislovja. Kazenskopravna teorija razlikuje med dvema temeljnima kategorijama objektivnega pogoja kaznivosti, pravim in nepravim (navideznim). Objektivni pogoji kaznivosti zapletajo razumevanje in še posebej pravosodno rabo inkriminacij, v katerih se zaradi takih ali drugačnih zakonodajalčevih kriminalitetnopolitičnih ciljev pojavijo. Objektivni pogoj kaznivosti je zagotovo ena bolj spornih akademsko obravnavanih tem v kazenskem pravu ravno zaradi nasprotovanja načelu subjektivne ali krivdne odgovornosti. Posebne probleme pa povzroča tudi vprašanje glede možnosti in kaznivosti poskusa kaznivega dejanja, v katerem je vsebovan objektivni pogoj kaznivosti, ter vprašanje glede možnosti udeležbe pri kaznivem dejanju, v katerem je vsebovan objektivni pogoj kaznivosti. Prav tako se lahko pojavi problem glede časa storitve kaznivega dejanja, ki vsebuje objektivni pogoj kaznivosti, zlasti dogmatično zapleteno postane, kadar je objektivni pogoj kaznivosti vsebovan v trajajočem kaznivem dejanju. Objektivni pogoj kaznivosti v splošnem delu slovenskega Kazenskega zakonika sploh ni definiran, pojavlja se le pri inkriminaciji posameznih kaznivih dejanjih v posebnem delu, zato je potrebna analiza vsakega konkretnega člena posebej, da bomo lahko ugotovili, ali neko kaznivo dejanje vsebuje institut objektivnega pogoja kaznivosti ali ne.
Keywords:	objektivni pogoj kaznivosti, pravi, nepravi, odnos načela krivdne odgovornosti in objektivnega pogoja kaznivosti, elementi splošnega pojma kaznivega dejanja, načelo zakonitosti, kompleksna analiza norme, poskus, udeležba, zastaranje, sodna praksa
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Place of performance:	Maribor
Publisher:	S. Kos
Year of publishing:	2023
Number of pages:	1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (85 str.))
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-85122
UDC:	343.131(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:	163832579
Note:	Sistemske zahteve: Acrobat reader
Publication date in DKUM:	08.09.2023
Views:	578
Downloads:	338
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:	CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:	The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:	19.08.2023

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Actual theoretical and practical dilemmas of the objective condition for criminal liability in criminal law
Abstract:	Objective condition for criminal liability is defined in modern criminal law theory as a special assumption of the criminality of an act, which is outside the scope of the general notion of a criminal offence. It is a circumstance that is directly related to the act, but is not part of the wrong that is covered by the essence of the crime. Objective condition for criminal liability is therefore not a part of the essence of a crime as an element in the tripartite stucture of the offence, but it means a material assumption of criminality, since a criminal act only arises when it is fulfilled. Criminal law textbooks like to emphasize that objective condition for criminal liability is especially outside the concept of guilt and does not require or tolerate the guilty attitude of the perpetrator. However, there are some criminal law theorists who, with their positions, try to avoid criticism that the objective condition of criminal liability opposes to the basic principle of guilt, and in doing so, they end up falling into contradictions. Criminal law theory distinguishes between two fundamental categories of the objective condition of criminality, proper and improper. Objective condition of criminal liability complicate the understanding and especially the judicial use of incriminations, in which they appear due to one or another of the legislator's criminal policy goals. Objective condition for criminal liability is certainly one of the more controversial academically discussed topics in criminal law precisely because of the opposition to the principle of guilt. Special problems are also caused by the question of the possibility and criminality of attempting to commit an offence, in which exist an objective condition for criminal liability, and the question of the possibility of participation in an offence, in which exist an objective condition for criminal liability. Also, a problem may arise regarding the determining time of the wrongful conduct of offence which contains an objective condition for criminal liability, especially it becomes dogmatically complicated when the objective condition for criminal liability is contained in a permanent offence. The objective condition for criminal liability is not defined at all in the general part of KZ-1, it appears only in the incrimination of individual criminal acts in the special part, therefore it is necessary to analyze any article in detail in order to determine whether the offence contains the institute of the objective condition for criminal liability or not.
Keywords:	objective condition for criminal liability, proper, improper, relationship of the principle of guilt and objective condition for criminal liability, elements of a criminal offence, principle of legality, complex analysis of the norm, attempt, participation, statute of limitations, case law

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back