| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Protipravno pridobljeni dokazi v luči ustavnih procesnih jamstev
Authors:ID Drnovšek, Katja (Author)
Files:.pdf Protipravno+pridobljeni+dokazi+v+luci+ustavnih+procesnih+jamstev.pdf (556,01 KB)
MD5: E2B9C1B38B4E82BE0C9C33A4D0E41FB0
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Unknown
Typology:1.16 - Independent Scientific Component Part or a Chapter in a Monograph
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:V slovenskem pravnem redu uporaba protipravno pridobljenih dokazov v pravdnem postopku ni normativno urejena, zato so se rešitve razvile v sodni praksi, ki to vprašanje naslavlja skozi prizmo reševanja kolizije ustavnih pravic. Prispevek se osredotoča na pomanjkljivosti ureditve, ki izhajajo iz odločbe Ustavnega sodišča RS kot edine pravne podlage za odločanje o dopustnosti dokazov, pridobljenih s kršitvami ustavno varovanih pravic. Obravnava teoretične vidike presoje dopustnosti protipravno pridobljenih dokazov v kontekstu ustavnih procesnih jamstev ter relevantno sodno prakso, v kateri se te težave odražajo. Posebna pozornost je posvečena pomenu pravice do dokaza, metodološkemu pristopu, ki naj se uporabi pri tehtanju pravic, ter argumentom, na podlagi katerih sodišča utemeljujejo svoje odločitve o dopustnosti dokazov. Prispevek kot najustreznejšo metodo za razreševanje kolizije pravic predlaga metodo praktične konkordance, hkrati pa opozarja na potrebo po poenotenju sodne prakse ob uporabi kriterijev, ki upoštevajo tako pravico stranke do dokaza kot tudi osebnostne pravice nasprotne stranke.
Keywords:protipravno pridobljeni dokaz, pravica do dokaza, kolizija pravic, načelo sorazmernosti, praktična konkordanca, pravdni postopek
Publication version:Version of Record
Year of publishing:2024
Number of pages:Str. 71-96
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-94392 New window
UDC:346
COBISS.SI-ID:181996035 New window
DOI:10.18690/um.pf.1.2024.3 New window
Publication date in DKUM:18.08.2025
Views:143
Downloads:37
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a monograph

Title:Studia Iuridica Miscellanea : MMXXI
Editors:Martina Repas
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
Year of publishing:2024
ISBN:978-961-286-817-8
COBISS.SI-ID:179685123 New window

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Illegally obtained evidence in view of procedural constitutional guarantees
Abstract:In the Slovenian legal system, the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence is not regulated by normative legal acts. Instead, solutions had to be established through case law, where this issue is being approached through the prism of balancing constitutional rights in conflict. The paper focuses on the shortcomings of the regulation stemming from the decision of the Slovenian Constitutional Court as the sole legal basis for determining the admissibility of evidence obtained in violation of constitutionally protected rights. It examines the theoretical aspects of assessing the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence in the context of procedural constitutional guarantees and relevant case law reflecting these challenges. Special attention is given to the significance of the right to evidence, the methodological approach to balancing rights, and the arguments applied by Slovenian courts when assessing the admissibility of evidence. The author suggests the use of practical concordance as the most appropriate method for resolving the conflicts of rights and highlights the need for the uniform application of criteria that consider both the party's right to evidence and the personal rights of the opposing party.
Keywords:illegally obtained evidence, the right to evidence, rights in conflict, the principle of proportionality, practical concordance, civil litigation


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica