Pravilo obrestne omejitve - direktiva EU o določitvi pravil proti praksam izogibanja davkom, ki neposredno vplivajo na delovanje notranjega trga

Kerin, Marko

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Pravilo obrestne omejitve - direktiva EU o določitvi pravil proti praksam izogibanja davkom, ki neposredno vplivajo na delovanje notranjega trga
Authors:	ID Kerin, Marko (Author)
Files:	Pravilo+obrestne+omejitve+-+Direktiva+EU+o+dolocitvi+pravil+proti+praksam+izogibanja+davkom,+ki+neposredno+vplivajo+na+delovanje+notranjega+trga.pdf (831,81 KB) MD5: 1E6BF56FFAFE775EADF609517A013B6E
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Unknown
Typology:	1.16 - Independent Scientific Component Part or a Chapter in a Monograph
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	S 1. 1. 2019 so bile nekatere države članice EU zavezane implementirati pravilo obrestne omejitve na podlagi Direktive proti izogibanju davkom (ATAD), druge države članice, vključno s Slovenijo, s primerljivo učinkovitim pravilom tanke kapitalizacije, pa morajo to napraviti najkasneje do 1. 1. 2024. Namen prispevka je obravnavati pravne dileme na ravni EU v zvezi s pravilom obrestne omejitve, zlasti z vidika njegove skladnosti s primarnim pravom EU. Članek osvetli problematiko preko sodne prakse Sodišča EU. Prikaže tudi potencialno neustavnost pravila obrestne omejitve v Nemčiji. V zadnjem delu najprej proučim sodbe slovenskih sodišč v zvezi s tanko kapitalizacijo. Sledi pregled slovenskih sodb v zvezi z davčnim načelom plačila davka na podlagi ekonomske sposobnosti in objektivnega neto načela. Na podlagi analize sodb Ustavnega sodišča RS lahko sklenemo, da bo z implementacijo pravila obrestne omejitve tudi v Sloveniji takšno pravilo diskriminiralo davčne zavezance. V zaključku prispevka je podanih nekaj predlogov zakonodajalcu.
Keywords:	pravilo obrestne omejitve, Direktiva proti zlorabam, BEPS, primarno pravo EU, ustavnost omejitvenega pravila
Publication version:	Version of Record
Year of publishing:	2024
Number of pages:	Str. 715-754
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-94403
UDC:	336.22
COBISS.SI-ID:	182210307
DOI:	10.18690/um.pf.1.2024.24
Publication date in DKUM:	18.08.2025
Views:	124
Downloads:	7
Metadata:
Categories:	Misc.
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a monograph

Title:	Studia Iuridica Miscellanea : MMXXI
Editors:	Martina Repas
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
Year of publishing:	2024
ISBN:	978-961-286-817-8
COBISS.SI-ID:	179685123

Licences

License:	CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:	The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Interest Limitation Rule – EU directive laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market
Abstract:	As of 1 January 2019, some EU Member States were obliged to implement the interest limitation rule on the basis of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD). Some Member States, including Slovenia (with a comparatively effective thin capitalization rule) must implement interest limitation rule by 1 January 2024 at the latest. The purpose of this paper is to address the legal dilemmas at EU level surrounding the interest limitation rule, particularly in terms of its compliance with EU primary law. The article sheds light on the issue through the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the EU. It also demonstrates the potential unconstitutionality of the interest limitation rule in Germany. In the last part, I first examine the judgments of the Slovenian courts on thin capitalization. This is followed by an overview of Slovenian judgments concerning the violation of the principle of ability to pay taxes and the objective net principle. Based on the analysis of the judgments of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, it can be concluded that the implementation of the interest limitation rule in Slovenia will also discriminate against taxpayers. The paper concludes with some suggestions to the legislator.
Keywords:	interest limitation rule, Anti-tax Avoidance Directive, BEPS, primary law EU, constitutionality of the limitation rule

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back