Organizacija javne oblasti v državah članicah EU : je nacionalna institucionalna avtonomija samo mit?

Ferčič, Aleš

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Organizacija javne oblasti v državah članicah EU : je nacionalna institucionalna avtonomija samo mit?
Authors:	ID Ferčič, Aleš (Author)
Files:	Organizacija+javne+oblasti+v+drzavah+clanicah+EU_+je+nacionalna+institucionalna+avtonomija+samo+mit_.pdf (498,53 KB) MD5: DE068629CD55C8DC8CAACA93B8A74765
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Unknown
Typology:	1.16 - Independent Scientific Component Part or a Chapter in a Monograph
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	V prispevku so obravnavane meje nacionalne institucionalne avtonomije, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri organizaciji javne oblasti v državah članicah EU. Obravnavane so zlasti v kontekstu vertikalne delitve pristojnosti, glavno vprašanje pa je, katera načela in pravila je treba upoštevati pri oblastnem določanju pristojnosti regionalnih in lokalnih oblasti, torej v okviru organizacije regionalne in lokalne samouprave. Avtor upošteva posebno naravo in značilnosti EU in njenega prava, vključno z načeli, ki so bistvenega pomena, ter evropeizacijo javnega prava. V tej zvezi utemelji stališče, da kljub uveljavitvi načela nacionalne institucionalne avtonomije v sodni praksi, in kljub določbi PEU o spoštovanju nacionalne identitete, ki je neločljivo povezana s temeljnimi političnimi in ustavnimi strukturami držav članic, vključno z regionalno in lokalno samoupravo, njihova avtonomija na tem področju ni absolutna. Zato meni, da je lahko v opisanem kontekstu uporaba pojma »avtonomija« nehote zavajajoča in namesto njega predlaga uporabo pojma »pristojnost« držav članic.
Keywords:	načelo nacionalne institucionalne avtonomije, javna uprava, ustavno in upravno pravo, pravo EU, evropeizacija javnega prava
Publication version:	Version of Record
Year of publishing:	2024
Number of pages:	Str. 557-580
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-94404
UDC:	342
COBISS.SI-ID:	182209539
DOI:	10.18690/um.pf.1.2024.18
Publication date in DKUM:	18.08.2025
Views:	144
Downloads:	94
Metadata:
Categories:	Misc.
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a monograph

Title:	Studia Iuridica Miscellanea : MMXXI
Editors:	Martina Repas
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
Year of publishing:	2024
ISBN:	978-961-286-817-8
COBISS.SI-ID:	179685123

Licences

License:	CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:	The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Organizacija javne oblasti v državah članicah EU: je nacionalna institucionalna avtonomija samo mit?
Abstract:	This article discusses the limits of national institutional autonomy which must be considered when organizing systems of public authority in Member States. The limits are discussed in particular in the context of vertical division of competences. The main question is which legal principles and rules must be considered when defining competences of regional and local authorities, that is to say, in the context of regional and local self-government. The author takes into account the special nature and characteristics of the EU and its law, including fundamental legal principles and the process of Europeanization of public law. In this regard, the author justifies the thesis that in spite of the establishment of principle of national institutional autonomy in the case law and in spite of the TEU’s provision on respect of national identity, which is inherent in Member States’ fundamental structures, political and constitutional (inclusive of regional and local selfgovernment), their autonomy in the discussed field is not absolute. Therefore, the author considers that in the described context, the use of the term "autonomy" can be unintentionally misleading and suggests the use of the term "competence" of the Member States instead.
Keywords:	principle of national institutional autonomy, public administration, constitutional and administrative law, EU law, Europeanization of public law

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back