| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Sacrificing natural kinds : Fodor’s legacy and the unity of science
Authors:ID Todorović, Tadej (Author)
ID Bregant, Janez (Author)
Files:.pdf RAZ_Todorovic_Tadej_2025.pdf (475,96 KB)
MD5: EEB049519DAA4816F8F093B5DD74F5B2
 
URL https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.19.1.33-50
 
Language:English
Work type:Scientific work
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:The article reevaluates Jerry Fodor’s key argument for the autonomy of the special sciences, which rests on the notion of multiple realization and the claim that special science predicates must be natural kinds. After outlining how Fodor’s view was shaped by the “syntactic” conception of scientific theories, it shows that the recent “semantic” approach in scientific theories challenges the idea that special science kinds must be natural and ontologically committing. On the semantic account, scientific models often invoke idealized or domain-specific predicates that do not have to be natural. We use Fodor’s example – Gresham’s law – to articulate a semantic perspective that preserves the unity of science: higher-level explanations can remain useful, real, and relatively autonomous without irreducible natural kinds. By “sacrificing” natural kinds, we retain the explanatory powers of the special sciences, create a simpler ontological picture of the world, and justify the modus operandi of the sciences, such as cognitive science, where knowledge from the different levels or disciplines that constitute it informs and refines our overall understanding of the world.
Keywords:natural kinds, unity of science, special sciences, Fodor
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:31.07.2025
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:str. 33-50
Numbering:Letn. 19, št. 1
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-94555 New window
UDC:165
ISSN on article:1854-9632
COBISS.SI-ID:246023939 New window
DOI:10.4312/ars.19.1.33-50 New window
Publication date in DKUM:29.08.2025
Views:138
Downloads:12
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Ars & humanitas : revija za umetnost in humanistiko
Publisher:Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete, Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete, Založba Univerze v Ljubljani
ISSN:1854-9632
COBISS.SI-ID:233246720 New window

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.
Licensing start date:31.07.2025

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Žrtvovanje naravnih vrst : Fodorjeva zapuščina in enotnost znanosti
Abstract:Članek znova ovrednoti ključni argument Jerryja Fodorja za avtonomijo posebnih znanosti, ki temelji na konceptu večvrstne realizacije in predpostavki, da morajo biti predikati posebnih znanosti naravne vrste. Po kratkem orisu »sintaktičnega« pojmovanja znanstvenih teorij, ki je oblikovalo Fodorjev vidik, pokaže, da novejše »semantično« pojmovanje spodkopava idejo, da morajo biti predikati posebnih znanosti nujno naravni in ontološko zavezujoči. Semantični pristop namreč poudarja, da znanstveni modeli pogosto uporabljajo idealizirane ali domensko specifične predikate, za katere ni nujno, da so naravni. S pomočjo Fodorjevega primera – Greshamovega zakona – oriše takšno semantično perspektivo, ki ohranja enotnost znanosti: razlage višjih ravni lahko ostanejo uporabne, realne in razmeroma avtonomne tudi brez nereducibilnih naravnih vrst. Z žrtvovanjem naravnih vrst tako ohranimo pojasnjevalno moč posebnih znanosti, ustvarimo preprostejšo ontološko sliko sveta in upravičimo modus operandi znanosti, kot je kognitivna znanost, kjer znanje z različnih ravni oziroma iz različnih disciplin, ki jo sestavljajo, bogati in izpopolnjuje naše skupno razumevanje sveta.
Keywords:naravne vrste, enotnost znanosti, posebne znanosti, Fodor


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica