| Title: | The puzzle of scientific disagreement |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Cocchiaro, Mariangela Zoe (Author)
ID Trpin, Borut (Author) |
|---|
| Files: |  RAZ_Cocchiaro_Mariangela_Zoe_2025.pdf (364,07 KB)
MD5: 95EF52B6AB0F5F98F17E7C46AA201992
 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13194-025-00662-4
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Work type: | Scientific work |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
|---|
| Organization: | FF - Faculty of Arts
|
|---|
| Abstract: | Scientists often find themselves in disagreement with their peers, yet continue to hold fast to their views. While Conciliationism, a prominent position in the epistemology of disagreement, condemns such steadfastness as epistemically irrational, philosophers of science often defend it as rationally permissible–indeed, even beneficial for scientific progress. This tension gives rise to what we call the puzzle of scientific disagreement. |
|---|
| Keywords: | scientific disagreement, conciliationism, steadfastness, philosophy of science, epistemology |
|---|
| Publication status: | Published |
|---|
| Publication version: | Version of Record |
|---|
| Article acceptance date: | 06.05.2025 |
|---|
| Publication date: | 02.06.2025 |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2025 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | str. 1-21 |
|---|
| Numbering: | Letn. 15, št. članka 35 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DKUM-94706  |
|---|
| UDC: | 165.194 |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 1879-4920 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 238533379 |
|---|
| DOI: | 10.1007/s13194-025-00662-4 |
|---|
| Publication date in DKUM: | 22.10.2025 |
|---|
| Views: | 153 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 11 |
|---|
| Metadata: |    |
|---|
| Categories: | Misc.
|
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Average score: | (0 votes) |
|---|
| Your score: | Voting is allowed only for logged in users. |
|---|
| Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
