| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Zakonska domneva odgovornosti lastnika vozila za prekrške v prometu
Authors:ID Tičar, Bojan (Author)
ID Mesarič, Tine (Author)
ID Selišnik, Franjo (Author)
Files:URL https://press.um.si/index.php/ump/catalog/book/1066/chapter/878
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Unknown
Typology:1.08 - Published Scientific Conference Contribution
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:V prispevku bomo opozorili na odprto vprašanje sedanje ureditve in praktičnega izvajanja zakonske domneve iz 8. člena Zakona o pravilih cestnega prometa (»Zakon o pravilih cestnega prometa (ZPrCP)«, 2010), ki rigidno temelji na ustavnem privilegiju zoper samoobtožbo. Zakonodajalec je z določitvijo domneve odgovornosti lastnika oziroma imetnika pravice uporabe vozila skušal doseči, da bi bili storilci prekrškov v cestnem prometu tudi dejansko kaznovani. Namreč, kaznovalna politika je eden od delov veljavne ureditve prometnega sistema, ki je ob upoštevanju obstoječega stanja v cestnem prometu ni mogoče enako učinkovito nadomestiti z drugimi ukrepi. Primerjalnopravne rešitve iz Nemčije, Hrvaške, Nizozemske in Avstrije kažejo, da je mogoče uvesti tudi učinkovitejše modele, ki spoštujejo sicer demokratični in ustavni privilegij zoper samoobtožbo, pa kljub temu dosegajo namen zakona v primerih, ko je bil prekršek zoper varnost cestnega prometa storjen z vozilom, pa ni mogoče ugotoviti, kdo je storilec.
Keywords:prekrškovno pravo, zakonska domneva nedolžnosti, obrnjeno dokazno breme, privilegij pred samoobtožbo, pravila cestnega prometa
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:Str. 53-60
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-96147 New window
UDC:343:656.051
COBISS.SI-ID:259469571 New window
DOI:10.18690/um.fvv.4.2025.5 New window
Publication date in DKUM:04.12.2025
Views:200
Downloads:4
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a monograph

Title:11. nacionalna konferenca o varnosti v lokalnih skupnostih : odpornost lokalnih skupnosti na varnostna tveganja
Editors:Gorazd Meško, Rok Hacin
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
Year of publishing:2025
ISBN:978-961-299-068-8
COBISS.SI-ID:254602243 New window
Conference organizer:Univerza v Mariboru, Fakulteta za varnostne vede

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Legal presumption of liability of the vehicle owner for traffic violations
Abstract:In this article, we will draw attention to the open issue of the current regulation and practical implementation of the legal presumption from Article 8 of the Road Traffic Rules Act ("Zakon o pravilih cestnega prometa (ZPrCP)", 2010), which is rigidly based on the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. By establishing the presumption of responsibility of the owner or holder of the right to use a vehicle, the legislator tried to ensure that perpetrators of road traffic offences would actually be punished. Namely, the penal policy is one of the parts of the current regulation of the traffic system, which, taking into account the existing situation in road traffic, cannot be replaced equally effectively by other measures. Comparative legal solutions from Germany, Croatia, the Netherlands and Austria show that it is possible to introduce more effective models that respect the democratic and constitutional privilege against self-incrimination, and achieve the purpose of the law in cases where a road traffic offence was committed with a vehicle, but it is not possible to determine who the perpetrator is.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica