| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Prednosti in slabosti dvotirnega zapisovanja govora v slovenskih govornih virih
Authors:ID Verdonik, Darinka (Author)
ID Trojar, Mitja (Author)
ID Bizjak, Andreja (Author)
Files:.pdf Prednosti+in+slabosti+dvotirnega+zapisovanja+govora+v+slovenskih+govornih+virih.pdf (485,45 KB)
MD5: E5518564D4DE4B7767DE1EB249BCAACD
 
URL https://press.um.si/index.php/ump/catalog/book/898/chapter/48
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Scientific work
Typology:1.16 - Independent Scientific Component Part or a Chapter in a Monograph
Organization:FERI - Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Abstract:Zapisovanje govora v govornih korpusih je nedvomno časovno največji vložek v procesu izdelave govornega korpusa in pomemben razlog, da so govorni korpusi neprimerno manjši od pisnih. Zapis govora je prevod iz izvorno večmodalnega kanala komunikacije, v katerem verbalno izraženi pomen sooblikujejo glas in način govora, govorica telesa in situacija, v kateri poteka komunikacija, v eno, pisno modalnost. Zaradi variabilnosti govora na vseh jezikovnih ravneh se zapisovalec pri tem nenehno sooča z vprašanjem, kako naj to, kar sliši, zapiše. Da bi bil zapis čim bolj verodostojen, hkrati pa časovno vseeno izvedljiv za velik obseg gradiv, se je tako poleg standardiziranega zapisa vzpostavil tudi tako imenovani pogovorni zapis, ki sledi načelu zapiši, kakor je izgovorjeno. Toda dvojni zapis zahteva dodaten trud, zato v tem prispevku kritično prevprašujemo njegovo utemeljenost glede na prakse drugod, zahtevan dodaten trud in njegove prednosti ter kritično analiziramo še druga težavnejša vprašanja zapisovanja.
Keywords:transkribiranje, standardizirani zapisi, ortografska transkripcija, pogovorni zapisi, fonetična transkripcija
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:18.07.2024
Publisher:Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
Year of publishing:2024
Number of pages:Str. 63-79
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-96488 New window
UDC:808
COBISS.SI-ID:202752259 New window
DOI:10.18690/um.ff.4.2024.4 New window
Publication date in DKUM:14.01.2026
Views:229
Downloads:5
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a monograph

Title:Stanje in perspektive uporabe govornih virov v raziskavah govora
Editors:Mira Krajnc Ivič
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
Year of publishing:2024
ISBN:978-961-286-882-6
COBISS.SI-ID:201876739 New window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Advantages and disadvantages of two-tier speech transcription in slovenian speech resources
Abstract:Transcribing speech in speech corpora is undoubtedly the largest time investment in the process of creating a speech corpus and an important reason that speech corpora are considerably smaller than written ones. Speech transcription is a translation from an originally multimodal channel of communication, in which verbally expressed meaning is shaped by the voice and manner of speaking, body language, etc., and converted into a single, written modality. Due to the variability of speech at all linguistic levels, the transcriber constantly faces the question of how to transcribe what s/he hears. In order to make the transcription as exact as possible, but at the same time feasible when working with large amounts of data, a pronunciation-based transcription was introduced in Slovenian speech corpora along with the standardized transcription. However, two-tier transcription requires additional effort. For this reason, this paper critically assesses its rationale, comparing practices used elsewhere, estimates of the additional effort and its advantages. Additionally, we assess other challenging aspects of speech transcription.
Keywords:transcribing, standardized transcription, orthographic transcription, literal transcription, phonetic transcription


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica