Kripke o esencializmu izvora materialnih predmetov

Justin, Martin

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Kripke o esencializmu izvora materialnih predmetov
Authors:	ID Justin, Martin (Author)
Files:	RAZ_Justin_Martin_2023.pdf (350,00 KB) MD5: 3B03E4D44A2B85DA645525564E00135F https://journals.um.si/index.php/analiza/article/view/3830
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Scientific work
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UZUM - University of Maribor Press FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:	V slavni 56. opombi Imenovanja in nujnosti Kripke ponudi argument za trditev, da je materialni izvor esencialna lastnost materialnih predmetov. V literaturi se je kmalu uveljavilo prepričanje, da je Kripke z njim poskušal esencializem materialnega izvora izpeljati zgolj iz svoje teorije imen. Obveljala je tudi trditev, da mu to ni uspelo. V članku poskušam ponuditi novo branje Kripkejevega argumenta. Trdim, da bi morali besedilo 56. opombe brati kot argument,utemeljen na istem sklopu intuicij o kontingentnosti in nujnosti, ki jih Kripke uporabi za zagovor svoje teorije togih označevalcev. Sicer se izkaže, da na ta način lahko utemelji zgolj šibko obliko esencializma materialnega izvora, a trdim, da je Kripkejeva nejasna ubeseditev teze o esencializmu skladna tudi s to šibko obliko. Najprej predstavim uveljavljeno rekonstrukcijo Kripkejevega argumenta in izpostavim njegove pomanjkljivosti. Nato povzamem dva pristopa k dopolnitvi argumenta in pokažem, zakaj ne uspeta. Na koncu predstavim še svoje branje Kripkejevega argumenta.
Keywords:	Imenovanje in nujnost, esencializem materialnega izvora, togi označevalci, intuitivni test
Publication status:	Published
Publication version:	Version of Record
Publication date:	22.12.2023
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
Year of publishing:	2023
Number of pages:	20
Numbering:	Letn. 27, št. 2
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-97185
UDC:	1Kripke A.:165.4
ISSN on article:	2712-4916
COBISS.SI-ID:	191756803
DOI:	10.18690/analiza.27.2.205-224.2023
Publication date in DKUM:	23.02.2026
Views:	214
Downloads:	4
Metadata:
Categories:	Misc.
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:	Analiza : časopis za kritično misel
Shortened title:	Analiza
Publisher:	Društvo za analitično filozofijo in filozofijo znanosti, Društvo za analitično filozofijo in filozofijo znanosti, Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
ISSN:	1408-2969
COBISS.SI-ID:	67716608

Licences

License:	CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:	This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Kripke on Material Origin Essentialism
Abstract:	In the famous footnote 56 of Naming and Necessity, Kripke offers an argument for a claim that material origin is an essential property of objects. It soon became widely accepted in the literature that Kripke was attempting to derive material origin essentialism from his theory of naming alone. It was also argued that he had failed to do so. In this paper, I try to offer a new reading of Kripke’s argument. I argue that the text of footnote 56 should be read as an intuitive argument, based on the same set of intuitions about contingency and necessity that Kripke uses to defend his theory of rigid designators. It turns out that he can only argue for a weak form of material origin essentialism in this way, but I argue that Kripke’s vague formulation of the essentialism thesis is consistent with this weak form as well. First, I present the received view of Kripke’s argument and point out its flaws. I then summarize two approaches to completing the argument and show why they fail. Finally, I present my reading of Kripke’s argument.
Keywords:	Naming and necessity, material origin essentialism, rigid designators, intuitive test

Collection

This document is a part of these collections:

Analiza

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back