| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Aristotel kot multiseksist : kontekstualne in metodološke dileme v razpravi o definiciji seksizma
Authors:ID Vezjak, Boris (Author)
Files:.pdf RAZ_Vezjak_Boris_2025.pdf (368,43 KB)
MD5: 0CAF8DE4617A71DB1D7AF947EC581DCA
 
URL https://journals.um.si/index.php/analiza/issue/view/507/74
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Scientific work
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:Prispevek obravnava vprašanje Aristotelovega seksizma z vidika sodobnih pojmovanj spola, znanosti in epistemološko odgovorne interpretacije. Izhaja iz teze, da njegov seksizem ni enodimenzionalen pojav, temveč kompleksen sistem večplastnih, tj. bioloških, političnih, filozofskih in metafizičnih perspektiv, ki strukturirajo njegovo razumevanje narave in družbe. S tem uvaja pojem multiseksizma, ki označuje prepletenost različnih kontekstualnih oblik spolne asimetrije v Aristotelovem filozofskem in znanstvenemsistemu. Analiza pokaže, da Aristotelova hierarhija med moškim in žensko ni le ideološka, temveč globoko vpisana v njegov znanstveni aparat, v koncepcijo narave, gibanja in teleologije. Članek opozarja, da razprava o Aristotelovem seksizmu ni vprašanje moralne sodbe, temveč metodološko vprašanje interpretacije: kako brati filozofske in znanstvene koncepte, ki so zgodovinsko pogojeni, ne da bi jih reducirali na sodobne normativne kategorije. Prispevek s tem odpira troje ključnih razmislekov: (1) o vlogi spol a v Aristotelovi biologiji in metafiziki; (2) o epistemoloških dilemah feministične filozofije znanosti pri interpretaciji klasičnih tekstov; ter (3) o možnostih reinterpretacije Aristotelove misli onkraj spolno hierarhičnih struktur. Cilj razprave je pokazati, da razumevanje Aristotela kot »multiseksista« ne pomeni zgolj kritike, temveč ponuja orodje za natančnejšo analizo zgodovinskih temeljev spolne diferenciacije v zahodni misli.
Keywords:seksizem, feministična filozofija znanosti, biologija, metafizika, interpretacija
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:06.02.2025
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:str. 131-152
Numbering:Letn. 29, št. 2
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-97490 New window
UDC:1(3)
ISSN on article:1408-2969
COBISS.SI-ID:271292163 New window
DOI:10.18690/analiza.29.2.131-152.2025 New window
Publication date in DKUM:31.03.2026
Views:310
Downloads:4
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Analiza : časopis za kritično misel
Shortened title:Analiza
Publisher:Društvo za analitično filozofijo in filozofijo znanosti, Društvo za analitično filozofijo in filozofijo znanosti, Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
ISSN:1408-2969
COBISS.SI-ID:67716608 New window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:06.02.2026

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Aristotle as a multi-sexist : contextual and methodological dilemmas in the debate over the definition of sexism
Abstract:The article examines the issue of Aristotle’s sexism from the perspective of contemporary concepts of gender, science, and epistemologically responsible interpretation. Positing that his sexism is not one-dimensional, the author introduces the concept of "multi-sexism" to describe the complex biological, political, and metaphysical relationships structuring his philosophical and scientific system. The analysis reveals that Aristotle’s gender hierarchy is deeply ingrained in his scientific framework, specifically regarding nature, movement, and teleology. The article argues that the debate on Aristotle's sexism is not about moral judgment, but rather a methodological question of interpretation: how to read historically conditioned philosophical and scientificconcepts without reducing them to contemporary normative categories. Three key considerations are raised: (1) gender in Aristotle’s biology and metaphysics; (2) epistemological dilemmas in feminist philosophy of science in interpreting classical texts; and (3) reinterpreting Aristotle beyond sexually hierarchical structures. The aim is to demonstrate that understanding Aristotle as a multi-sexist is not merely a criticism, but that this approach offers a tool for a more precise analysis of the historical foundations of sexual differentiation in Western thought.
Keywords:feminist philosophy of science, metaphysics, interpretation, sexism


Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. Analiza

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica