Naratološki nastavki v zgodnjih razpravah Jožeta Toporišiča

Štuhec, Miran

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Naratološki nastavki v zgodnjih razpravah Jožeta Toporišiča
Authors:	ID Štuhec, Miran (Author)
Files:	RAZ_Stuhec_Miran_2026.pdf (1,13 MB) MD5: 1BF7160E0F0A3F805E5052A95AA9D609 https://doi.org/10.4312/jis.71.1-2.247-257
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Scientific work
Typology:	1.02 - Review Article
Organization:	FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:	V članku se bom ukvarjal z dvema razpravama Jožeta Toporišiča, in sicer s člankom, objavljenim v Jeziku in slovstvu Razmišljanje o Finžgarjevi prozi ter monografsko knjigo Pripovedna dela F. S. Finžgarja. Oboje opozarja na avtorjev takrat zelo sodoben interes za strukturalistične in naratološke poglede na književnost. Sredi šestdesetih let prejšnjega stoletja je revija Jezik in slovstvo poudarila uredniški koncept, ki je bil usmerjen k sodobnim književnoznanstvenim dinamikam, znan predvsem v zahodnem svetu. Argument za tako trditev je objavljeni članek Jožeta Toporišiča Razmišljanje o Finžgarjevi prozi. Ob tem je potrebno opozoriti še na že navedeno monografijo, izdala jo je Slovenska matica. Obe deli kasnejšega najbolj prepoznavnega slovenskega jezikoslovca sta bili zelo zanimiva popestritev slovenskih literarnovednih procesov. Ob tem ne mislim samo na avtorjevo strukturalistično analizo izbranega pripovednega korpusa, marveč v isti meri tudi za njegov nesporni interes za narativne vidike v književnem delu. Toporišičeva monografija je Finžgarjev prozni opus zajela kompleksno in tako, da je razčlenjeni material sistematizirala na različnih ravneh, hkrati pa evocirala zaključke, ki so pojasnili uporabljene pripovedne postopke ter razložili funkcijo piščevih slogovnih odločitev. Potrebno pa je opozoriti, da Jože Toporišič na nekaterih mestih svojega naratološkega uvida ostaja nedorečen in teoretsko ohlapen, predvsem manjka jasna distinkcija med slovničnimi kategorijami pripovedovalca ter njegovim referenčnim poljem takrat, ko bi bilo to nujno; denimo pri razlikovanju med jazovim (prvoosebnim) in vsevednim pripovedovalcem.
Keywords:	Jože Toporišič, Fran S. Finžgar, strukturalizem, naratologija, pripovedna proza
Publication status:	Published
Publication version:	Author Accepted Manuscript
Publication date:	23.07.2026
Place of publishing:	Ljubljana
Publisher:	Založba Univerze v Ljubljani
Year of publishing:	2026
Number of pages:	str. 247-257
Numbering:	Letn. 71, št. 1/2
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-99576
UDC:	821.163.6.09
ISSN on article:	0021-6933
COBISS.SI-ID:	288289027
DOI:	10.4312/jis.71.1-2.247-257
Publication date in DKUM:	20.08.2026
Views:	134
Downloads:	6
Metadata:
Categories:	Misc.
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:	Jezik in slovstvo
Shortened title:	Jez. slovst.
Publisher:	Slavistično društvo Slovenije, Slavistično društvo Slovenije, Založba Univerze v Ljubljani, Zveza društev Slavistično društvo Slovenije
ISSN:	0021-6933
COBISS.SI-ID:	746756

Licences

License:	CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:	This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.
Licensing start date:	23.07.2026

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Narratological interest in the early discussions of Jože Toporišič
Abstract:	In this article, I will deal with two essays by Jože Toporišič, namely the article published in Jezik in slovstvo titled "Razmišljanje o Finžgarjeva prozi" and the monographic book Pripovedna dela F. S: Finžgarja. Both point to the author's then very contemporary interest in structuralist and narratological views on literature. In the mid-1960s, the journal Jezik in slovstvo emphasized an editorial concept that was oriented towards contemporary literary and scientific dynamics, which was known mainly in the Western world. The argument for this claim is an article by Jože Toporišič, "Razmišljanje o Finžgarjeva prozi". In addition, it is necessary to note the already mentioned monograph, published by Slovenska matica. Both works by the man who was to become the most recognized Slovenian linguist were a very interesting enrichment of Slovenian literary dynamics. By this I do not mean only the author's structuralist analysis of the selected narrative corpus, but also his undeniable interest in the narrative aspects of literary works. Toporišič's monograph covered Finžgar's prose in a complex way, systematizing the analysed material on different levels, while at the same time evoking conclusions that explained the narrative procedures used and the function of the writer's stylistic decisions. However, it should be noted that Jože Toporišič remains vague and theoretically loose in some places in his narratological insight, especially with regard to lacking a clear distinction between the grammatical categories of the narrator and his field of reference, such as in the distinction between the ego and the omniscient narrator.
Keywords:	Jože Toporišič, Fran S. Finžgar, structuralism, narratology, narrative prose

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back