| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Miranda v. Arizona in njegov vpliv na slovensko ureditev : diplomsko delo visokošolskega strokovnega študija Varnost in policijsko delo
Authors:ID Mandić, Aleksandar (Author)
ID Zgaga Markelj, Sabina (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf VS_Mandic_Aleksandar_2013.pdf (391,49 KB)
MD5: BD2826C706E8BC720977A738455FBB66
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Pooblastila iz kazenskega postopka najbolj posegajo v temeljne človekove pravice. Ker je posameznikova pravica do svobode lahko hitro ogrožena, so zato še toliko bolj pomembna in potrebna procesna jamstva, ki morajo biti sorazmerna s potencialno kršitvijo prava. Eno izmed nabora procesnih jamstev je tako tudi pouk osumljencu v maternem jeziku, da ni dolžan ničesar izjaviti, da ima pravico do zagovornika ter obvestitev njegovih bližnjih. Ta pravica izvira iz znanega ameriškega sodnega primera Miranda v. Arizona, ki ima svoj temelj v petem amandmaju k ameriški ustavi. Tudi slovenski pravni red pozna t. i. miranda warnings, tako tisto, ki izhaja iz Ustave Republike Slovenije, kot tisto iz 4. člena Zakona o kazenskem postopku. Tako torej v Sloveniji poznamo kar tri različne mirande, poleg prej navedenih dveh se ta procesna pravica uporablja tudi pred formalnim zaslišanjem, ki ga opravljajo policisti, in je urejena v 148. členu ZKP. Tako ameriška kot tudi slovenska sodna praksa sta to pravico skozi razvoj dopolnjevali in izpopolnili do mere, da jo dandanes lahko štejemo za eno izmed pravic, ki vplivajo na učinkovitost varstva osumljenca v postopku pred državnimi organi.
Keywords:kazenski postopek, zaslišanje, pravica do molka, pravica do zagovornika, miranda, diplomske naloge
Place of publishing:[Ljubljana
Publisher:A. Mandić]
Year of publishing:2013
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-42826 New window
UDC:343.1(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:2706922 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:EJJCLL5A
Publication date in DKUM:06.12.2013
Views:3010
Downloads:685
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:Procurations included in the criminal law are especially threatening to fundamental human rights. It is due to the vulnerability of an individual's right to freedom that the procedual guarantees are particularly important and necessary, and they must be proportional to the potential criminal offence. One of the procedural guarantees is informing the suspect, in their native language, about their right to remain silent, their right to counsel and their right to inform their relatives about the custody. These rights originate in the well-known USA court case, Miranda v. Arizona, whose foundations are in the fifth amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The Slovenian legal order is also familiar with the so-called Miranda warnings, with one of them stemming fom the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia, and the other one regulated by Article 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act. Apart from the aforementioned warnings, this procedural right is also used before the formal interrogation conducted by police officers, and is regulated by Article 148 of the CPA. Both the American and the Slovenian judicial practice have amended and improved this right to the point where it can now be regarded as one of those rights that influence the effectiveness of suspect protection in a procedure against the state authorities.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica