| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:An analysis of interaction effects of China–South Korea and China–Australia FTAs and the expanding TPP
Authors:ID Yuhong, Sun (Author)
ID Yifei, Mu (Author)
ID Yang, Jun (Author)
Files:.pdf Nase_gospodarstvoOur_economy_2016_Yuhong,_Yifei,_Yang_An_Analysis_of_Interaction_Effects_of_China–South_Korea_and_China–_Australia_FTAs.pdf (285,29 KB)
MD5: D113CCE38E03E2D8AF0669CD6FCE5A00
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/b69446cf-8ff8-4c2c-a6e8-7aa5c86f3aed
 
URL https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ngoe.2016.62.issue-4/ngoe-2016-0020/ngoe-2016-0020.xml
 
Language:English
Work type:Scientific work
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
Abstract:On 5 October 2015, the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) led by the U.S. was signed. Already, 12 countries1 have joined the agreement, but China has not. Thus, lots of research has focused on the negative effect of the TPP on China’s foreign trade. On the other hand, China is moving forward in its own efforts to establish bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs) and free trade zones. In June 2015, China-South Korea and China-Australia signed bilateral FTAs which went into effect in December 2015. Several questions were raised: Since South Korea and Australia are the major trade partners in the Pacific area and the bilateral FTAs will be effective before the TPP, will these FTAs’ positive effects on China’s foreign trade offset some of the negative effects of the TPP? If China and the U.S. adopted a competitive trade policy, which countries would benefit? If China and the U.S. adopted a cooperative trade policy, how would the trade value and economic welfare change? This paper simulates and analyses the mutual effects of China-South Korea and China-Australia FTAs and the enlarging TPP using the computable general equilibrium model. The major conclusions drawn suggest that China-South Korea and China-Australia FTAs will significantly offset the TPP’s negative effect on China’s foreign trade. If China is not included, the U.S. economic benefit from the TPP will be limited. The economic welfare for a country like Australia, which joined both the bilateral FTA and the TPP, will be increased the most. In the long run, China joining the TPP would be the most beneficial decision for its national interest. However, if the TPP cannot be approved by the US congress, the U.S.’s economic indicators and export would be decreasing sharply. China’s economy and export will benefit from FTAs.
Keywords:China-South Korea FTA, China-Australia FTA, TPP, interaction effects
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year of publishing:2016
Number of pages:12-22
Numbering:Letn. 62, št. 4
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-70312 New window
ISSN:2385-8052
UDC:339.5:338.2
ISSN on article:2385-8052
COBISS.SI-ID:295364864 New window
DOI:10.1515/ngoe-2016-0020 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:ENCNADHT
Publication date in DKUM:03.05.2018
Views:1270
Downloads:314
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Naše gospodarstvo : revija za aktualna ekonomska in poslovna vprašanja
Publisher:Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta
ISSN:2385-8052
COBISS.SI-ID:274517248 New window

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:03.05.2018

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Analiza interakcijskih učinkov sporazuma o prosti trgovini med Kitajsko in Južno Korejo ter Kitajsko in Avstralijo ter razširjenega transpacifiškega sporazuma o partnerstvu
Abstract:Transpacifiškemu sporazumu o partnerstvu, ki je bil sklenjen 5. oktobra 2015, se je že pridružilo 12 držav. Ker Kitajska k sporazumu ni pristopila, je bilo veliko raziskav osredotočenih na negativne učinke na kitajsko zunanjo trgovino po sklenitvi tega sporazuma. Po drugi strani si Kitajska prizadeva, da bi omogočila svoj razvoj z bilateralnim sporazumom o prosti trgovini in z območji proste trgovine. Junija 2015 je Kitajska podpisala bilateralna sporazuma z Južno Korejo in Avstralijo; veljati sta začela decembra 2015. Pojavila so se številna vprašanja: Ker sta Južna Koreja in Avstralija glavni trgovinski partnerici na pacifiškem območju in ker bosta bilateralna sporazuma o prosti trgovini učinkovita še pred transpacifiškim sporazumom o partnerstvu, ali bodo pozitivni učinki sporazumov o prostem trgovanju nadomestili nekatere negativne učinke transpacifiškega sporazuma o partnerstvu? Katere države bodo imele korist od tega, da bi Kitajska in Združene države Amerike privzele tekmovalno trgovinsko politiko? Kako bi se spremenili tržna vrednost in ekonomska blaginja, če bi Kitajska in ZDA privzele sodelovalno trgovinsko politiko? V prispevku simuliramo in analiziramo vzajemne učinke sporazumov o prosti trgovini med Kitajsko in Južno Korejo ter Kitajsko in Avstralijo ter razširjenega transpacifiškega sporazuma o partnerstvu z uporabo izračunljivega modela splošnega ravnovesja. Glavne ugotovitve so: sporazuma o prosti trgovini med Kitajsko in Južno Korejo ter Kitajsko in Avstralijo bosta značilno nadomestila negativne učinke transpacifiškega sporazuma o partnerstvu na kitajsko zunanjo trgovino. Če Kitajska ne bo vključena, bo ekonomska korist transpacifiškega sporazuma o partnerstvu za ZDA omejena. Ekonomska blaginja za državo, kot je Avstralija, se bo s pridružitvijo tako bilateralnemu sporazumu o prosti trgovini kot transpacifiškemu sporazumu o partnerstvu najbolj povečala. Na dolgi rok bo odločitev Kitajske, da se pridruži transpacifiškemu sporazumu o partnerstvu, za njene nacionalne interese prinesla največ koristi.
Keywords:sporazum o prosti trgovini med Kitajsko in Južno Korejo, sporazum o prosti trgovini med Kitajsko in Avstralijo, transpacifiški sporazum o partnerstvu, interakcijski učinki


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica