Kantovi argumenti za tezo "bit ni realni predikat"

Kravanja, Aljoša

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Kantovi argumenti za tezo "bit ni realni predikat"
Authors:	ID Kravanja, Aljoša (Author)
Files:	RAZ_Kravanja_Aljosa_2023.pdf (384,37 KB) MD5: 8709B35F8506004A1BAA6564138ED733 https://journals.um.si/index.php/analiza/article/view/3828
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Scientific work
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UZUM - University of Maribor Press FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:	Kant je menil, da lahko s tezo »Bit ni realni predikat« zavrne ontološki dokaz za Božje bivanje, kot sta ga historično razvila Anzelm in Descartes. Svojo tezo o biti je predstavil v Edinem možnem argumentu in kasneje v Kritiki čistega uma. Toda ali je podal jasne razloge zanjo? Članek trdi, da lahko iz Kantove zgoščene obravnave izluščimo štiri argumente za tezo o biti: opisni argument, argument iz popolnoma določenega pojma, primerjalni argument in identifikacijski argument. Predstavljene so prednosti in šibkosti Kantovih argumentov (ki so včasih presenetljivo trivialne). Članek trdi, da je četrto sklepanje, ki ima strukturo reductio argumentacije, najmočnejše, kljub temu, da se klasične obravnave Kantove teze (Hegel, Heidegger, Barnes, Hintikka) osredotočajo na druge argumente.
Keywords:	filozofija, ontologija, bit, predikat, eksistenca
Publication status:	Published
Publication version:	Version of Record
Publication date:	22.12.2023
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
Year of publishing:	2023
Number of pages:	20
Numbering:	Letn. 27, št. 2
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-97182
UDC:	111
ISSN on article:	2712-4916
COBISS.SI-ID:	191265795
DOI:	10.18690/analiza.27.2.177-196.2023
Publication date in DKUM:	23.02.2026
Views:	135
Downloads:	4
Metadata:
Categories:	Misc.
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:	Analiza : časopis za kritično misel
Shortened title:	Analiza
Publisher:	Društvo za analitično filozofijo in filozofijo znanosti, Društvo za analitično filozofijo in filozofijo znanosti, Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
ISSN:	1408-2969
COBISS.SI-ID:	67716608

Licences

License:	CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:	This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Kantʼs grounds for the "being is not a real predicat" thesis
Abstract:	Influentially, Kant argued against the ontological proof by suggesting that being is not a real predicate. He developed the thesis in the Only Possible Argument and later in Critique of Pure Reason. But what are the reasons Kant gave for the thesis on being? The paper claims that there are four separate arguments embedded in Kant’s text: the descriptive argument, the argument from the thoroughly determined concept, the argument from comparison, and the identification argument. The respective advantages and sometimes surprisingly trivial flaws of the arguments are examined. The paper argues that the fourth argument appears to be the strongest one, even though the classic treatments of Kant’s thesis (Hegel, Heidegger, Barnes, Hintikka) concentrate on the first three.
Keywords:	philosophy, ontology, being, predicat, existence

Collection

This document is a part of these collections:

Analiza

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back