| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Kleveta svobode, diskriminacija dostojanstva
Authors:ID Jeršič, Alja (Author)
Files:.pdf RAZ_Jersic_Alja_2025.pdf (303,60 KB)
MD5: 8C641673B14675D31D816A444215E8E4
 
URL https://journals.um.si/index.php/analiza/en/article/view/5854/3537
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Scientific work
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
UZUM - University of Maribor Press
Abstract:V sodobnem liberalizmu zahodnega sveta se svoboda izražanja pogosto povzdiguje v temeljno vrednoto, ki naj bi varovala pluralnost mnenj ter avtonomijo vsakega posameznika. Vendar pa se v kontekstu pornografije ta ideal zaplete v lastno protislovno mrežo, kjer svobodi izražanja preti, da postane sredstvo utrjevanja neenakosti. Pričujoči članek problematizira predvsem liberalno razumevanje takšne svobode, ki v imenu tolerance pogosto spregleda razmerja moči, ki ta diskurz pogojuje. V prvem delu prispevka predstavimo razumevanje svobode R. Dworkina, kot neprisiljene izbire, in feministično kritiko C. A. MacKinnon, ki opozarja, da pornografija ni le svoboda izražanja, temveč diskurz, v katerem se svoboda izražanja prelevi v svobodo zatiranja. V drugem delu zagovarjamo stališče, da liberalna toleranca do vsebin, ki degradirajo (predvsem ženska) telesa, razkriva paradoks tolerance, ki v strahu pred cenzuro izgubi samo sebe. V zaključku zato poudarimo, da svoboda brez etične odgovornosti ne osvobaja, temveč diskriminira.
Keywords:liberalizem, pornografija, feministična filozofija, kapitalizem
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Article acceptance date:31.08.2025
Publication date:17.12.2025
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:str. 113-127
Numbering:Letn. 29, št. 1
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-97673 New window
UDC:123
ISSN on article:1408-2969
COBISS.SI-ID:272964611 New window
DOI:10.18690/analiza.29.1.113-128.2025 New window
Publication date in DKUM:03.04.2026
Views:235
Downloads:4
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Analiza : časopis za kritično misel
Shortened title:Analiza
Publisher:Društvo za analitično filozofijo in filozofijo znanosti, Društvo za analitično filozofijo in filozofijo znanosti, Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
ISSN:1408-2969
COBISS.SI-ID:67716608 New window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:17.12.2025

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Defamation of freedom, discrimination of dignity
Abstract:In contemporary Western liberalism, freedom of expression is often elevated to a fundamental value that is supposed to protect the plurality of opinions and the autonomy of each individual. However, in the context of pornography, this ideal becomes entangled in its own contradictory web, where freedom of expression threatens to become a means of reinforcing inequality. This article problematizes the liberal understanding of such freedom, which, in the name of tolerance, often overlooks the power relations that condition this discourse. In the first part of the article, we present R. Dworkin's understanding of freedom as uncoerced choice and C. A. MacKinnon's feminist critique, which argues that pornography is not only freedom of expression but also a discourse in which freedom of expression turns into freedom of oppression. In the second part, we argue that liberal tolerance of content that degrades (especially female) bodies reveals the paradox of tolerance, which loses itself in fear of censorship. In conclusion, we emphasize that freedom without ethical responsibility does not liberate, but discriminates.
Keywords:liberalism, pornography, feminist philosophy, capitalism


Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. Analiza

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica